Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 60.5 kB
Pages: 1
Date: August 31, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 364 Words, 2,185 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/20007/43.pdf

Download Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut ( 60.5 kB)


Preview Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut
Case 3:02-cv-01810-AVC Document 43 Filed 08/30/2004 Page 1 of 1 l
] ; ` I ai
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT qi Q li, ,.-,_ ,
"' *·*·‘¤ ·J-_. .:·x1U·
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT - _ _. {
CANDIDO TORRES 1 CIVIL NO. 3:02CVl8il 0(AVC)(TPS)
v. :
JACK TOKARZ, ET AL. : AUGUST 19, 2004
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
The defendants respectfully request a thirty (30) day extension of time up to and
including October 18, 2004 to submit the defendants’ Trial Memorandum in this case. There is
good cause for this motion in that (1) Undersigned counsel is picking a Jury on September 8,
2004 and will be on trial in Bridgeport Federal Court before Magistrate Judge Garfinkel in
Taylor v. Armstrong, 3:97CV973(WIGl). (2) Undersigned counsel has a personal family matter,
out of state, on September 16 and 17, 2004, due to family and religious obligations on those
days. (3) Undersigned counsel will be fully engaged in (a) an Appellate Brief in Whitaker v.
Commissioner of Correction, A.C. No. 24485, due August 31, 2004. (4) On even date herewith, y
defendants have tiled their consent to tiial by a U.S. Magistrate Judge. l
The plaintiff is a pro se prisoner and his position has not been ascertained. This is the
. i
i
I
I
L Ii; K
_ 3:02CVl8l0(AVC). August 26, 2004. The defendants' motion (document l
no. 42) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. To the extent that li
the defendants seek an extension of time to file the joint trial
memorandum, the motion is GRANTED. The parties shall have t¤*ana i
including October 18, 2004, to file the joint trial memorandums To ` A
the extent that the defendants' motion seeks an order referring this ii:
matter I to a magistrate judge for trial, the motion is DENIED v¢iiithou·t___
prejudice to its renewal upon the fili g of a consent fOI`m signed b‘y—4.l
both parties. I . ta » E
W SO ORDERED. ,»~'a·ji—_··e_·__ ,jjjpj f j_ ,___ 7 1-- to `
i Alfre V. Covello, U.S.D.J. 1- O
_ i_ é_ y r --=-·~ ~<·s . l `jij f ·_e· ij j
_ ---.·- Q ej·e
` C f` t ‘ to ..`..