Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

_ U t I
Case 3:02-cv-02187-gV_WE Document 44 Filed O1/22/2004 llgggegll ol|¥H·°*$l"M Q- I
. ‘ 5 ( D ' _. J I
M E I` l L. E D I
ZUUII JAN 20 F) I2= 5 "I I
I
UCS []I"""<¤
~ Giulio; lng-·-_· I
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT BR IIIp;;rIn;m {Sli` ‘ I
oisrmcr or cowivscncur ‘ "" “" ‘ * I
CAROL TRELOAR, ADMX
OF THE ESTATE OF KENNETH TRELOAR, I
PLAINTIFF I
VS CIVIL ACTION NO.
. 3:O2CV2l87(WWl§).~/rl/L’<"' I
; EUCLID—I-IITACHI HEAVY EQUIPMENT,
I DEFENDANT IANUARY 16, 2004 I
I §’ MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME
Z
Q E Z3 Pursuant to Rule 6 of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure and Rule 9(b)(1) of the Local
E .
5 E-.;?_. g Y Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff herein moves for an enlargement of time to extend the U
cs 3 2
E g E g deadline dates set forth in the Planning Report of the parties, dated Ianuary 28, 2003, as follows:
*6 ’
3 g E M 1. Said Planning Report states that the defendant was to disclose its expert witnesses by
* 2
C: ]une 16, 2003 and that the deposition of the defendant's expert witness was to be deposed by
\.
October 31, 2003.
2. On October 15, 2003 the defendant requested an extension of time up to December 1, I
2003 within which to disclose its expert witness and said extension was granted by this court. I
...D I
Q =j_ -On December 1, 2003 the defendant disclosed its expert witness.
. it ag.} ii ·--‘-=
[]_ letter to defendant’s counsel, dated December 12, 2003, (See Exhibit A attached
of-» HE It `
mil l’ct1éreto)—ct§tr$1nselfor the plaintiff requested dates for scheduling the defendants expert witness’ I
“"'°" Z EE In I
LLM i agar;
g Cf} BJ
r-··• "_‘jj I