Free Motion to Dismiss - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

..,7, rr,... -.-._.-...2......|A...—..;._._i....%jJ_-.?_.sn_,_-___...__j_____________________
Case 3:02-cv-01612-RNC Document 34 Filed O2/12/2004 Page 1 of 2 E
UNITED STATES DISTRICT i ii -3 ` TP i Qi
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT rr _ \
` ‘ Y `·I- ·* 5:: F `--‘
STEPHEN GOLD, Z NO. 3:02CYi`l 612. - i
plaintgjf :
V.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC
SAFETY, etal., :
defendants. : JANUARY 13, 2004
I . MOTION FOR ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Pursuant to the provisions of Rule 4l(a)(2) ofthe Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the
plaintiff; by and through his counsel, hereby moves for the dismissal of the above captioned A
l
lawsuit, with prejudice. The plaintiff further respectfully requests that the provisions ofthe
attached Stipulation of Settlement be incorporated herein consistent with Kokkonen v. Guardian
Ly'e Insurance C0. of America, 51 1. U.S, 375, 114 S.Ct. 1673, 128 L.Ed.2d 391 (1994).
THE PLAINTIFF
Robert S. Kolesnik, Esq. V
Kolesnik & Norris
80 Central Avenue [
Waterbury, Connecticut 06702 J
Fed. Bar No. 06-1049342
Tel: (203) 574-5233
HIS ATTORNEY
J
W nn F- W W l

* 1
· A Case 3:02-cv-01612-RNC Document 34 Filed O2/12/2004 Page 2 of 2
. ¤‘
1
- CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing Motion for Order of Dismissal was
mailed, first-class, postage pre-paid, to all pro se parties and/or counsel of record on this the
@1.day ¤f ..._,t@L-
Stephen R. Sarnoski, Esq.
Assistant Attorney General
MacKenzie Hall
_ 110 Sherman Street
Hartford, Connecticut 06105
0*/% 1
Ro ert S. Kolesnik, Esq. 1
PLAINTIFF’S ATTORNE
1
1
1
1
2 1
1
1 1