Page 1 of 2
ELECTRONICALLY FILED ON JUNE 23, 2005 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Defendant. )
No. 00-129C (Judge Allegra)
PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE MEMORANDUM IDENTIFYING AND SUMMARIZING A DECISION INTERPRETING THE LANGUAGE IN CAS 9903.306(B) It became apparent at the June 20, 2005 oral argument in this case that the parties were interpreting the language of CAS § 9903.306(b), with neither having developed for the Court the reason for the creation of § 306(b), nor provided administrative interpretations or any decisions interpreting this regulation. There is an ASBCA decision that does this. Counsel for Plaintiff respectfully moves for leave to file a memorandum identifying and summarizing the relevant parts of a decision that interprets the language in CAS Reg. 9903.306(b). Counsel for Defendant has authorized undersigned counsel to state that she has no objection to the granting of this motion, provided she will be given an opportunity to reply to the memorandum. A courtesy copy of the memorandum is attached hereto as Exhibit 1.
Page 2 of 2
Respectfully submitted, s/Clarence T. Kipps _________________________________ Clarence T. Kipps, Jr., Esq. MILLER & CHEVALIER Chartered 655 15th Street, N.W., Suite 900 Washington, D.C. 20005 Tel: (202) 626-5800 Fax: (202) 628-0858 Attorney of Record Lockheed Martin Corporation Of Counsel: Angela B. Styles, Esq. Kimberly R. Heifetz, Esq. MILLER & CHEVALIER Chartered 655 15th Street, N.W., Suite 900 Washington, D.C. 20005 Tel: (202) 626-5800 Fax: (202) 628-0858 David M. Christenson, Esq. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION 6801 Rockledge Drive Bethesda, Maryland 20817 Tel: (301) 897-6127 Fax: (301) 897-6333 Dated: June 23, 2005