Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Federal Claims - federal


File Size: 35.7 kB
Pages: 3
Date: February 1, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: federal
Category: District
Author: unknown
Word Count: 470 Words, 2,922 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cofc/22856/6.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Federal Claims ( 35.7 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Federal Claims
Case 1:07-cv-00861-SGB

Document 6

Filed 02/01/2008

Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

WYOMING SAWMILLS, INC. Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No. 07-861C (Judge Braden)

DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR AN ENLARGEMENT OF TIME Defendant respectfully requests an enlargement of time of 60 days, to and including April 4, 2008, within which to file its response to plaintiff's complaint. Defendant's response is now due to be filed on February 4, 2008. This is defendant's first request for an enlargement of time for this purpose. Defendant has contacted counsel for plaintiff, who has indicated that plaintiff does not oppose this request. Defendant has sent to the Department of Agriculture ("DOA") a copy of the complaint with a request for a litigation report and suggested response to the complaint, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 520. On January 29, 2008, defendant's counsel received the litigation report and suggested response to the complaint from DOA. However, because of defendant's counsel's workload, defendant's counsel will need additional time to review the litigation report and suggested response to the complaint, obtain any additional information or clarification from the DOA, and prepare and file the Government's response to the complaint, following mandatory supervisory review. Counsel of record's workload includes discovery in the case of Edge Construction Co. v. United States, No. 06-635C, a motion to dismiss in the case of Hines v. United States, No. 07-623C, which is due on February 4, 2008, and settlement negotiations in the

Case 1:07-cv-00861-SGB

Document 6

Filed 02/01/2008

Page 2 of 3

cases of Kelly v. United States, No. 07-369C, State Automobile Mutual Insurance Company, Inc. v. United States, No. 07-516C, and Hoh River Timber Co. v. United States, No. 06-418C. For these reasons, defendant respectfully requests that the Court grant its unopposed motion for a 60-day enlargement of time, to and including April 4, 2008, within which to file its response to plaintiff's complaint.

Respectfully submitted,

JEFFREY S. BUCHOLTZ Acting Assistant Attorney General JEANNE E. DAVIDSON Director /s Bryant G. Snee BRYANT G. SNEE Deputy Director /s L. Misha Preheim L. MISHA PREHEIM Trial Attorney Commercial Litigation Branch Civil Division Department of Justice Attn: Classification Unit 8th Floor 1100 L St., NW Washington, D.C. 20530 Tele: (202) 305-3087 Fax: (202) 305-1571

February 1, 2008

Case 1:07-cv-00861-SGB

Document 6

Filed 02/01/2008

Page 3 of 3

CERTIFICATE OF FILING I hereby certify that on the 1st day of February, 2008, a copy of the foregoing "UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT" was filed electronically. I understand that notice of this filing will be sent to all parties by operation of the Court's electronic filing system. Parties may access this filing through the Court's system.

s/L. Misha Preheim