Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Federal Claims - federal

Case 1:07-cv-00707-CFL

Document 6

Filed 12/27/2007

Page 1 of 3

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS
DAVID WHALEN, GREGORY TURNER, GREG MORGAN and ATC1 through ATC50, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant

) ) ) ) No. 07-707C ) (Judge Lettow) ) ) ) ) ) )

P A N IFSMO I NF RE L R E N OF TIME TO REPLY TO L I TF ' TO O N A G ME T D F N A TSMO I NT D S S T EC MP A N I P R A DMO I N EE D N ' TO O IMIS H O L I T N A T N TO FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT

Pursuant to Rule 6.1 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims ( C C )Pa tf r usa E l gm n o Tm tr lt " e nat Mo o t " F " ln fse etn n re et f i eo e yo D f dn s t no R , i i' q a p e ' i Ds i t C m ln iPrad t n o a rD f i Sa m n "Pa tf i s h o p i n a n Mo o fr Moe e n e te et ln fs m s e at t i it t . i i' request an additional 45 days, as eD f dn s t naw i t e ln fs t nw r e nat Mo o,t h hi Pa tf o e ' i c m i i' response would be due on February 16, 2008. Plaintiffs have not previously asked for an enlargement of time in this action. Pa tfbs t seusfrn n re et f i e pn e nat Mo o ln f aeh r eto a E l gm n o Tm uo D f dn s t n i is i q a e ' i tDs i w e i D f dnC uslte,MrWhl sol nt e l w d o e o i s hr n e nat ones t " . a n hu o b ao e t b a m s e e ad e d l plaintiff in duplicativ at n, e fr h sol b d m s d rm t su . e cost r oe e hu e i i e f h si" i he , d s s o i t MOTION TO DISMISS A t t e fin Pa tf cusl a ua a o Abbey v. United States, th i o fi ln fs onew s nw r f em l g i i' e Fed. Cl. No. 07-272C (filed May 5, 2007). Id. More specifically, Plaintiff Counsel was

Case 1:07-cv-00707-CFL

Document 6

Filed 12/27/2007

Page 2 of 3

unaware and had not been informed whether (1) Whalen was a named plaintiff in that at n n ()hr apa d o ei o s irlm r sd i MrWhl ' co ad 2 t e per t b l e ri l c i sa e wt . a ns i e e k ma a i h e involvement in both this and the Abby action. Effingham County Bd. of Education v. United States, 9 Cl. Ct. 177, 179-180 (1985) As such, because Plaintiffs were unaware of MrWhl 'aee i o e et ln f r usa E l gm n o Tm tm r . a ns lgdn l m n Pa tf e etn n re et f i eo oe e l vv , i is q a fully investigate the Government claims regarding this matter and then to determine the appropriate course of action. THIS MOTION IS UNOPPOSED P r atoh rl , ln fs onehs o f d e nat oneo t s us n tt u sPa tf C usl a nti D f dn C usl fh u e e i i' ie e i request for an Enlargement of Time until February 16, 2008. Defendant counsel replied s t g" do not oppose your 45-dy n re et Therefore, the Court should grant ti ,We an a el gm n" a . Pa tf m t n o a el gm no t eo n i l i Fbur 1,08 the ln fs o o frn n re et fi tad n u n eray 620 for i i' i a m cdg reasons provided herein.

Respectfully Submitted

s/Jeffrey D. Moffatt

Jeff Moffatt, Esq. 43625 N Sierra Hwy, Suite A Lancaster, CA 93534 661 9456121 Fax 661 9453019 [email protected] I hereby certify that on December 27, 2007 a copy of the foregoing motion P A N IFSMO I NF RE L R E N O TME TO REPLY TO L I TF ' TO O N A G ME T F I D F N A TSMO I NT D S S T EC MP A N I P R A DMO I N EE D N ' TO O IMIS H O L I T N A T N TO FOR A MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT was filed electronically. I understand that

Case 1:07-cv-00707-CFL

Document 6

Filed 12/27/2007

Page 3 of 3

nte fh fi wlb sn ta pre b oe t n fh C ut e c oifi o c o t sin i e eto l a i y pr i o t ors l t n in i i lg l l ts ao e ' e r c lg system. Pre m y cesh fi t og t C ut ss m a i a acst sin h uhh ors yt . ts i lg r e ' e s/Jeffrey D. Moffatt