Free Letter - District Court of Delaware - Delaware


File Size: 32.8 kB
Pages: 1
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Delaware
Category: District Court of Delaware
Author: unknown
Word Count: 424 Words, 2,617 Characters
Page Size: 612 x 794 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ded/9372/11-1.pdf

Download Letter - District Court of Delaware ( 32.8 kB)


Preview Letter - District Court of Delaware
Case 1:05-cv-00055-KAJ Document 11 Filed 03/28/2005 Page 1 of 1
LAw OFFICES
SCHMITTINGER AND RODRIGUEZ, P.A. HAH¤¤.¤ $¤HM|'|'¤'¤NGE¤
NICHOLAS H. RODRIGUEZ OF COUNSEL
PAUL H_ E¤S,.,E._._ 414 SOUTH STATE STREET
gown J. 5c:»·iMi1·nNGER POST OFFICE BOX 497
OUGLA5 B. Currrs W|LMlNGTON OFFPCE
wu.r.iAM D. FLETCHER, JR. DOVER, DELAWARE 19901 E!R.Ar·1¤·rwn~1E GATEWAY PLAZA
T¤LEP+·=>~E 302-674—¤*4¤
WILLIAM iw. PEPPER 5R. FAX 302*674*18BO TELEP•-•oNE 302-652-3676
CRYSTAL L. CAREY` FAX 302-652-8758
Scovr E. CHAMBERS-
FRED A. Townszrm III REi-i¤s0T•-i BEACH OFFICE
NOEL E. Pmmos wAcRoviA BANK BuiL¤mc.
DAVID A. BOSWELL 4602 HIGHWAY ONE
WALT F. SCHMITTINGER RE•-aoaoTH BEACH, DELAWARE 19971
R. $co·r·r KAPPES TELEPHONE 302-2.27-1400
JEFFREY J. CLARx FAX 302-645-1843
BETH B. MILLER
KYLE KEMMER ODESSA Oi=Pi<:E
SEEMA VERMA ODESSA PROFESSIONAL PARK
P. KRISTEN BENNETT POST 0EP•cE Box 626
Loan A. BREwiu¢;T0u DDESA, DELAWARE 19730
TELEPi-i0ME 302-378-1597
‘ALs¤ ADMl'I'|"ED N MARYLAND FAx 302-378-1659
March 28, 2005
The Honorable Kent A. Jordan
United States District Court Via Electronic Mail
for the District of Delaware
844 N. King Street
Lock Box 10
Wilmington, DE 19801
RE: Robin D. Nichols v. Bennett Security Corporation, et al.
C.A. No.: 05-55-KAJ
Dear Judge Jordan,
Filed electronically with this letter is the Scheduling Order developed by the Court during the
telephone conference of Friday, March 18, 2005. All parties are in agreement with it and believe
that it reflects the provisions developed during the aforementioned conference.
l would also like to take this opportunity to apologize for any inconvenience caused the Court
by not having a copy of the proposed scheduling order prior to the date of the telephone
conference, March 18, 2005. Since l viewed this document as a draft, 1 requested my staff to
inquire on Monday, March 14, 2005 about the procedure for filing this document. We were
informed to mail the hard copy, which was done on Monday, March 14. 2005. This mailing was
directed to the Clerk of the Court. On Friday. March 18. 2005 we were advised that the earlier
instructions were inaccurate and we should now ““fax” the draft for the conference. ln the future.
1 will make sure that these draft documents are electronically tiled with the Court and again
apologize 1`or the inconvenience caused the Court.
R€,Sp§Ctfu,lly yojgizrgm/Q} f /2 ,·-wa
1/xfilllém D. Flev{l·l’i€rT r.
MWF/¤m1< sti} rD# 362
Enclosures __ `