Case 1:05-cv-00037-SLR
Document 121
Filed 05/11/2007
Page 1 of 3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE HARRY SAMUEL Plaintiff, v. THOMAS CARROLL, (WARDEN), LT. PORTER, COUNSELOR KRAMER, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER ROBERT YOUNG, the I.B.C.C. (CLASSIFICATION COMMITTEE), DENTAL SERVICE, CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC., and FIRST CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL, Defendants. : : : : : : : : : : : : : :
C.A. No. 05-037-SLR
TRIAL BY JURY DEMANDED
MOTION OF DEFENDANT, CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL SERVICES, INC., FOR ENTRY OF FINAL JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 54(b) Defendant, Correctional Medical Services, Inc., by and through its attorneys, moves this Court to enter the attached Order, entering final judgment in this action and states as follows: 1. On December 4, 2006, the Court issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order in
response to Correctional Medical Services Inc. and the State defendants' Motions to Dismiss. D.I. 100 & 101. A copy of the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order of December 4, 2006, is attached hereto as Exhibit "A". 2. In the Court's Opinion and Order of December 4, 2006, the Court held, with
respect to plaintiff's claim regarding delay in dental treatment, that liability did not lie with Correctional Medical Services, Inc. Therefore, the Court granted Correctional Medical Services,
Case 1:05-cv-00037-SLR
Document 121
Filed 05/11/2007
Page 2 of 3
Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss. On December 8, 2006, plaintiff filed a Motion for Reconsideration, but only as to the Court's decision dismissing the State defendants. D.I. 103. 3. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b), Correctional Medical Services,
Inc. moves this Honorable Court to enter final judgment in favor of Correctional Medical Services, Inc. on the Court's prior decision on Correctional Medical Services, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss. 4. Rule 54(b) entitled "[j]udgment upon multiple claims or involving multiple
parties", provides: When more than one claim for relief is presented in an action, whether as a claim, counterclaim, cross-claim, or third-party claim, or when multiple parties are involved, the Court may direct the entry of a final judgment as to one or more but fewer than all of the claims or parties only upon an express determination that there is no just reason for delay and upon an express direction for the entry of judgment. 5. There is no just reason to delay the entry of a final judgment as to Correctional
Medical Services, Inc. in the present case. Correctional Medical Services, Inc. was dismissed because liability did not lie with Correctional Medical Services, Inc. Entry of a final judgment as to Correctional Medical Services, Inc. would not hinder the progression of plaintiff's still active case. WHEREFORE, defendant, Correctional Medical Services, Inc., respectfully moves this Honorable Court to enter the attached Order, expressly determining that there is no just reason for delay and expressly directing entry of final judgment in favor of defendant, Correctional Medical Services, Inc.
Case 1:05-cv-00037-SLR
Document 121
Filed 05/11/2007
Page 3 of 3
MARSHALL, DENNEHEY, WARNER, COLEMAN & GOGGIN BY:/s/ Kevin J. Connors KEVIN J. CONNORS, ESQ. DE Bar ID: 2135 1220 North Market Street, 5th Fl. P.O. Box 8888 Wilmington, DE 19899-8888 Attorney for Defendant, Correctional Medical Services, Inc.
Date: May 11, 2007
\15_A\LIAB\KAMEANY\LLPG\427332\KAMEANY\13252\00162