Free Letter - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1:05-cv-00022-MPT Document 138-2 Filed 10/25/2007 Page 1 of 3 L
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
, FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
E .........*.................... X A
ST. PAUL MERCURY INSURANCE C.A. No.: 05-0022-MPT
COMPANY and PACK & :
, PROCESS, INC. :
Plaintiff,
A MALY YAN, W _
l Defendant.
f “··—·························· X
YAN THOU, et al., C.A. No.: 05-0513-MPT
1 Plaintiffs,
: CONSOLIDATED CASES
f v. :
PACK & PROCESS, INC., et al.,
j Defendants.
- ----——-- -- ---- - - ——--- ·· —------—— X
SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULENG ORDER
At Wilmington, the __ day of ___, 2007, the Court having conducted a
teleconference with all parties for the purpose of supplementing the September 16, 2005
Scheduling Order for the above captioned matter,
T ET iS ORDERED that:
1. Discovery has been completed. Defendant l\/Ialy Yan seeks to take one
additional Rule 30(b)(6) depositions. Plaintiffs St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company and

Case 1:05-cv-00022-MPT Document 138-2 Filed 10/25/2007 Page 2 of 3
Pack and Process, Inc. object to the deposition. Plaintiffs shall tile a letter, no more that
three (3) pages, twelve (12) point font and single-space on or before Tuesday, October
30, 2007, explaining their objection. Defendants may collectively submit one response
_ letter, no more than three (3) pages, twelve (*12) point font, sing|e—spaced within forty-eight
(48) hours or Plalntiffs’ submission.
i 2. Pretrial Conference. On September 3, 2008, the Court will hold a Final Pretrial
Conference in Chambers with counsel beginning at 9:30 a.m. Unless otherwise ordered
_ by the Court, the parties should assume that tiiing the pretrial order satishes the pretrial
· disclosure requirement of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(3). The parties shall tile
with the Court the joint proposed final pretrial order with the information required by the
i form of Final Pretrial Order which accompanies this Scheduling Order on or before August
. 20, 2008.
3. Motions in Limine. Motions in limine shall not be separately tiled. All in limine
requests and responses thereto shall be set forth in the proposed pretrial order. Each
party shall be limited to tive in limine requests, unless otherwise permitted by the Court.
The in Iimine request and any response shall contain the authorities relied upon; each in
limine request may be supported by a maximum of three pages of argument and may be
opposed by a maximum of three pages of argument. If more than one party is supporting or
opposing an in limine request, such support or opposition shail be combined in a single
three (3) page submission, unless otherwise ordered by the Court. No separate briefing
shall be submitted on in Iimine requests, unless otherwise permitted by the Court. _
4. Jun; instructions, Voir Dire, and Special Verdict Forms. Where a case is to be
tried to a jury, pursuant to Local Rules 47 and 51 the parties should tile proposed voir dire,

. Case 1:05-cv-00022-MPT Document 138-2 Filed 10/25/2007 Page 3 of 3 E
D instructions to the jury, and special verdict forms and jury interrogatories three full
business days before the tinal pretrial conference. That submission shall be accompanied
by a computer diskette (in WordPerfect format) which contains the instructions, proposed
voir dire, special verdict forms, and jury interrogatories. _ T
5. E This matter is scheduled fora four dayjurytrial beginning at 9:30 a.m. on
September 22, 2008 with the remaining trial days beginning at 9:00 a.m. For the purpose
of completing pretrial preparations, counsel should plan on each side being allocated a
total often (10) hours to present their case.
UNITED STATES l\/IAGISTRATE JUDGE