Free Motion to Dismiss/Lack of Subject Jurisdiction - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1 :05-cv-00016-JJF Document 10 Filed O3/15/2005 Page 1 of 4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
NOKIA CORPORATION and )
NOKIA, INC., )
)
Plaintiffs, )
) C.A. N0. 05-16-HF
v. )
)
INTERDIGITAL COMMUNICATIONS )
CORPORATION and 1`NTERDIGITAL ) DEMAND FOR JU RY TRIAL
TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION, )
)
Defendants. )
DEFENI)ANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF
CIVIL PROCEDURE 12g§)g1[, 12g§)g6), AND 12g§)(3[
OF COUNSEL: Richard L. Horwitz (#2246)
David E. Moore (#3983)
D. Dudley Oldham POTTER ANDERSON & CORROON LLP
Robert S. Harwell Hercules Plaza, 6m Floor
Richard S. Zembek 1313 N. Market Street
FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI L.L.P. P. O. Box 951
1301 McKinney, Suite 5100 Wilmington, Delaware 19801
Houston, Texas 77010-3095 Telephone: (302) 984—~6000
Telephone: (713) 651-5151 [email protected]
Telecopier: (713) 651-5246 [email protected]
do]dhamg@,fn1lbright.com
r1iartell(@f¤1lbright.eom Attorrzcysj for Defendants Interdigiml
[email protected] Communications Corporation and
Interdigiial Technology Corporation
Dan D. Davison
FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI L.L.P.
2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 2800
Dallas, Texas 75201-2784
Telephone: (214) 855-8000
Teiecopier: (214) 855-8200
[email protected]
Dated: March I5, 2005

Case 1 :05-cv-00016-JJF Document 10 Filed O3/15/2005 Page 2 of 4
Defendants lnterDigital Communications Corporation and lnterDigitai
Technology Corporation (collectively, “interDigita1") — prior to filing their answer and
discovery — tile this Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
l2(b)(l), i2(b)(6), and i2(h)(3). In support thereof, interDigital respectfully shows this
Court as follows:
l, On January 12, 2005, Plaintiffs Nokia Corporation and Nokia, inc.
(collectively, "Nokia") tiled their Original Complaint in this case, seeking: (l) a
declaratory judgment of nonintiingement and invalidity as to certain patents held by
InterDigital; and (2) relief under Section 43 ofthe Lanham Act (15 U.S.C. § ll25(a)).
2. lnterDigital —~ prior to tiling its answer and discovery — now tiles this
motion to dismiss any and all of Nokia’s claims against lnterDigital pursuant to Federal
Rules of Civil Procedure l2(b)(l), i2(b)(6), and l2(h)(3). The grounds for interDigital’s
motion to dismiss are fully set forth in the Opening Brief in Support of Defendants’
Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure l2(b)(l), l2(b)(6), and
l2(h)(3) and supporting materials filed contemporaneously with this motion
3. interljigital further requests that this Court award lnterijigital its
reasonable attorney’s fees and costs in this litigation and reserves the right to submit
separate and additional briefing in support of its entitlement to such fees ar1d costs.
CONCLUSION
For the reasons stated above, Defendants lnterDigital Communications
Corporation and interDigital Technology Corporation (“lnterDigital") respectfully
request that this Court: (l) grant InterDigital’s Motion to Dismiss; and (2) dismiss any
and all of Plaintiffs Nokia Corporation and Nokia, Inc.’s claims against InterDigital.

Case 1 :05-cv-00016-JJF Document 10 Filed 03/15/2005 Page 3 of 4
If this Court grants such relief in hill or in pan, lnterDigital further requests that
this Court -— pursuant to 35 `tJ.S.C. § 285, 15 U.S.C. § lll7(a), 28 U.S.C. § 1919, Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 54(cl), District of Delaware Local Rule 54.l(a)(1), and any other
applicable law — award lnterDigital its reasonable attorney’s fees and costs in this
litigation. lnterDigital expressly reserves the right to submit separate and additional
briefing in support of its entitlement to such attomey’s fees and costs.
InterDigital further requests all other reliefto which it may be entitled.
Respectfully submitted,
OF COUNSEL: POTTER ANDER N & CORROON LLP
D. Dudley Oldham A:_ng_;£rr--»i~i‘l‘ _qJ_y11.r L __ 'i``§xE::-l·:. -r’·* =;;j3?;%E
Robert S. Harrell By: __;Ei* 'Ei: . .t=lr "iii‘’`i’‘‘· -=i~»·e··==~*~
Richard S. Zembek Richard . Horwitz (#2246)
FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI l...L.P. David E. Moore (#3983)
1301 McKinney, Suite 5100 Hercules Plaza, 6m Floor
Houston, Texas 77010-3095 1313 N. Market Street
Telephone: (7}.3) 651-5151 P. O. Box 95l
Telecopier: (713) 651-5246 Wilmington, Delaware 19801
[email protected] Telephone: (302) 984-6000
[email protected] rliorwitz@,potteranderson.com
rzem‘oek(@,f11lbright.com [email protected]
Dan D. Davison Attorneysfor Defendants Interdigital
FULBRIGHT & JAWORSKI L.L.P. Communications Corporation and
2200 Ross Avenue, Suite 2800 Interdigital Technology Corporation
Dallas, Texas 75201-2784
Telephone: (214) 855-8000
Telecopietz (214) 855-8200
ddavison(@,fulbright.com
Dated: March 15, 2005
673970
2

Case 1 :05-cv-00016-JJF Document 10 Filed 03/15/2005 Page 4 of 4
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR TI-IE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, David E. Moore, hereby certify that on March 15, 2005, the attached document
was electronically tiled with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF which will send
notification of such fi1ing(s) to the following and the document is available for viewing
and downloading from CM/ECP:
Jack B. Blumenfeld
Julia Heaney
Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Ttmnell
1201 N. Market Street
P. 0. Box 1347
Wilmington, DE l9899~· 1 347
I hereby certify that on March 15, 2005, I have Federal Expressed the documents
to the following non-registered participants:
Peter Kontio
Patrick J. Flinn
Gardner S. Culpepper
Keith E. Broyles
Alston & Bird LLP
1201 West Peachtree Street
Atlanta, GA 30309-3424
Richard L. Horwitz
David E. Moore
Hercules Plaza, 6°‘ Floor
1313 N. Market Street
Wilmington, Delaware l9899—095l
(302) 984—6000
rhorwitz@,pottetanderson.com
dmoore@,_gotteranderson.com
673950