Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Colorado - Colorado


File Size: 8.7 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Colorado
Category: District Court of Colorado
Author: unknown
Word Count: 229 Words, 1,726 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cod/26216/54-2.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Colorado ( 8.7 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Colorado
Case 1:04-cv-01295-LTB-CBS

Document 54-2

Filed 11/08/2005

Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 04-cv-01295-LTB-CBS BETTY GALLEGOS, BERTHA PACHECO, LAURA REYES, MANUELA ARRAS, DAVID ZUBIA, ANTONIO MEZA, JESUS ARENIVAR, ALBA BARRIOS, GLORIA CAMPOS, SAN JUANITA CELEDON, REYNEL CARMONA, SYLVIA CRUZ, JESUS ESTRADA, MARIA ISABEL FLORES, JORGE MARTINEZ, MARIA MCREYNOLDS, IGNACIO RANGEL, JUANA ROSALES, MARIA TOVAR, ANTELMO ZUNUN, MARIA ALVA, PETRONA COREAS, MARIA ESTEVEZ, ALFREDO PINEDA, CARMEN LUNA, PATTY LEHMKUHL & LUIS OCHOA, Plaintiffs, v. SWIFT & COMPANY, Defendant. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME IN WHICH TO ANSWER PLAINTIFFS' REQUESTS FOR ADMISSIONS AND PLAINTIFFS' SECOND SET OF INTERROGATORIES AND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS ______________________________________________________________________________ THIS MATTER coming before the Court upon Defendant's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time in Which to Answer Plaintiffs' Requests for Admissions and Plaintiffs'

Case 1:04-cv-01295-LTB-CBS

Document 54-2

Filed 11/08/2005

Page 2 of 2

Second Set of Interrogatories and Requests for Production of Documents, and the Court being fully advised in the premises, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion is hereby GRANTED, and Defendant shall have up to and including December 20, 2005 in which to answer Plaintiffs' Second Set of Interrogatories, Plaintiffs' Second Set of Requests for Production of Documents, and Plaintiffs' First Set of Requests for Admissions. BY THE COURT

________________________________________

2