Free Supervised Release - Final Revocation Hrg - District Court of Colorado - Colorado


File Size: 10.0 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Colorado
Category: District Court of Colorado
Author: unknown
Word Count: 258 Words, 1,915 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cod/18005/339.pdf

Download Supervised Release - Final Revocation Hrg - District Court of Colorado ( 10.0 kB)


Preview Supervised Release - Final Revocation Hrg - District Court of Colorado
Case 1:03-cr-00519-LTB

Document 339

Filed 06/30/2006

Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO CHIEF JUDGE LEWIS T. BABCOCK _______________________________________________________________________ Courtroom Deputy: Deborah Hansen Court Reporter: Kara Spitler Date: June 30, 2006 Probation: Emily Valentin

_____________________________________________________________________ Criminal Action No. 03-cr-00519-LTB UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. 1. MARY JOE HUNT, Defendant. _____________________________________________________________________ HEARING ON VIOLATION OF SUPERVISED RELEASE _____________________________________________________________________ 10:03 a.m. Court in Session Darren Cantor Counsel: Robert Mydans

Defendant present (in-custody) Defendant sworn and answers true name; Defendant is 33 years old Defendant understands and ADMITS to all violations of supervised release. Defendant advised of the possible penalties and consequences. Defendant's constitutional rights explained. Defendant is advised of right to a hearing. Court accepts defendant' admissions to Violation Nos. 1, 2 and 3. s 1

Case 1:03-cr-00519-LTB

Document 339

Filed 06/30/2006

Page 2 of 2

Court FINDS defendant violated conditions of supervised release Statement by Mr. Mydans Statement by Mr. Cantor Supervised Release is REVOKED ORDERED: Defendant shall be imprisoned ten months with credit to be determined by the Bureau of Prisons. The sentence imposed, the Court finds and concludes, is sufficient but not greater than necessary to comply with the purposes set forth in paragraph (2) of 18 U.S.C. ยง 3553(a). The Court recommends that the Bureau of Prisons place the defendant at a facility in Phoenix. ORDERED: Defendant advised of right to appeal. ORDERED: Defendant is REMANDED to custody of U.S. Marshal. 10:34 a.m. Court in Recess Hearing concluded Time: /31

2