Free Amended Document - District Court of Colorado - Colorado


File Size: 16.7 kB
Pages: 6
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Colorado
Category: District Court of Colorado
Author: unknown
Word Count: 1,024 Words, 6,249 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cod/17950/409.pdf

Download Amended Document - District Court of Colorado ( 16.7 kB)


Preview Amended Document - District Court of Colorado
Case 1:03-cr-00495-WDM

Document 409

Filed 04/26/2007

Page 1 of 6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO JUDGE WALKER D. MILLER COURTROOM MINUTES

Courtroom Deputy: Kathy Preuitt-Parks Court Reporter: Darlene Martinez Probation Officer: n/a CASE NO. 03-CR-00495-WDM Parties UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, vs. FREDERICK D. DEBERRY and RODGERICK L. LACKEY,

Date: April 26, 2006 Time: 2 hours and 47 minutes Interpreter: n/a

Counsel Joshua Stein David Conner

Pro Se R. Scott Reisch

Defendants.

AMENDED MINUTES OF MOTIONS HEARING

1:43 p.m.

COURT IN SESSION

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. Mark Johnson is present as Advisory Counsel for defendant Frederick D. Deberry. Defendants Frederick D. Deberry and Rodgerick L. Lackey is present and in custody. Government' Motion for Psychiatric Exam (Doc #398), filed 4/26/07. s

Case 1:03-cr-00495-WDM

Document 409

Filed 04/26/2007

Page 2 of 6

Page Two 03-CR-00495-WDM April 26, 2007 Mr. Johnson advises that he has received Mr. Deberry' notice of intent to pursue a s defense of insanity but thought Mr. Deberry would be pursuing a defense of diminished capacity. After discussing this with the defendant, Mr. Deberry would like to correct his notice to reflect he will be pursuing a diminished capacity defense. Court inquires the defendant, who concurs with Mr. Johnson' comments. s Comments by Mr. Stein. Further comments by Mr. Johnson. Court will consider Mr. Deberry' request to amend his notice to reflect a diminished s capacity defense. ORDERED: Mr. Johnson shall provide a draft order consistent with 18 ยง 4242, including the qualified individual who would be performing the evaluation. Defendants'Motions to Suppress (Doc #189 and Doc #309), filed 10/18/04. 2:05 p.m. Direct examination of Government' witness John Skowronek by Mr. s Stein. Cross examination by Mr. Reisch. Cross examination by Mr. Deberry.

2:23 p.m. 2:43 p.m.

Witness excused. 2:55 p.m. 3:01 p.m. 3:12 p.m. 3:15 p.m. Direct examination of Government' witness Patrick Griffiths by Mr. Stein. s Cross examination by Mr. Reisch. Cross examination by Mr. Deberry. Redirect examination by Mr. Stein.

Witness excused. 3:25 p.m. 3:40 p.m. COURT IN RECESS COURT IN SESSION

Case 1:03-cr-00495-WDM

Document 409

Filed 04/26/2007

Page 3 of 6

Page Three 03-CR-00495-WDM April 26, 2007 3:41 p.m. 3:44 p.m. Argument by Mr. Reisch. Argument by Mr. Deberry.

Court states its findings and conclusions. ORDERED: Defendants' Motions to Suppress (Doc #189 and Doc #309), filed 10/18/04 are DENIED. ORDERED: Defendant Paul S. Talifero' Motion for Discovery (Doc #213), filed s 11/10/04 is DENIED. ORDERED: Defendant Paul S. Talifero' Motion to Compel Disclosure of Existence s and Substance of Promises of Immunity, Leniency or Preferential Treatment (Doc #294 ), filed 4/13/07 is DENIED. ORDERED: Defendant Paul S. Talifero' Motion for Discovery (Doc #295), filed s 4/13/07 is DENIED. ORDERED: Defendant Paul S. Talifero' Motion to Suppress (Doc #309), filed s 10/18/04 is DENIED. ORDERED: Defendant Paul S. Talifero' Motion to Strike (Doc #310), filed 10/18/04 is s DENIED. ORDERED: Defendant Paul S. Talifero' Motion for Discovery (Doc #311), filed s 11/10/04 is DENIED. ORDERED: Defendant Paul S. Talifero' Motion for Sanctions (Doc #312), filed s 12/3/04 is DENIED. ORDERED: Defendant Rodgerick L. Lackey' Motion to Strike (Doc #191), filed s 10/18/04 is STRICKEN. Defendant Frederick D. Deberry' Motion to Dismiss (Doc #349), filed 12/6/06. s 3:55 p.m. 4:05 p.m. Argument by Mr. Johnson. Argument by Mr. Stein.

Case 1:03-cr-00495-WDM

Document 409

Filed 04/26/2007

Page 4 of 6

Page Four 03-CR-00495-WDM April 26, 2007 4:12 p.m. Further argument by Mr. Johnson.

ORDERED: Defendant Frederick D. Deberry' Motion to Dismiss (Doc #377), filed s 1/24/07 is STRICKEN. ORDERED: Defendant Frederick D. Deberry' Motion to Dismiss Indictment (Doc s #392), filed 4/5/07 is DENIED and the argument contained in this motion will be addressed in the Court' ruling concerning the Motion to Dismiss s (Doc #349). ORDERED: Defendant Frederick D. Deberry' Motion Re: Civilian Clothes (Doc s #357), filed 1/24/07 is DENIED. ORDERED: Defendant Frederick D. Deberry' Motion to Transport Defendant (Doc s #358), filed 1/24/07 is DENIED. ORDERED: Defendant Frederick D. Deberry' Motion for Disclosure of 404(b) s Evidence (Doc #393), filed 4/5/07 is DENIED as MOOT. ORDERED: Defendant Rodgerick L. Lackey' Motion to Adopt Previously filed Motions s (Doc #293), filed 4/12/06 is GRANTED. ORDERED: Defendant Rodgerick L. Lackey' Motion to Join and Adopt Motions filed s by Co-Defendant Talifero (Doc #303), filed 4/18/06 is GRANTED. Defendant Frederick D. Deberry' Motion for Discovery (Doc #364), filed 1/12/07. s 4:20 p.m. 4:26 p.m. Argument by Mr. Johnson. Argument by Stein.

ORDERED: Defendant Frederick D. Deberry' Motion for Discovery ( Doc #364), filed s 1/12/07 is GRANTED as to the roster list and DENIED as to the mass interview forms. Discussion regarding whether the trials shall remain severed and speedy trial. Comments by Mr. Stein.

Case 1:03-cr-00495-WDM

Document 409

Filed 04/26/2007

Page 5 of 6

Page Five 03-CR-00495-WDM April 26, 2007 Comments by Mr. Reisch, requesting the Court make an ends of justice finding, to allow him to adequately prepare to proceed to trial as to defendant Rodgerick L. Lackey. Court concludes that the ends of justice served by excluding from today, up to and including July 30, 2007 from the speedy trial calculations outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendants in a speedy trial. Taking into account the exercise of due diligence. Considering time needed to obtain the psychiatric examination, and determining order of trial, location and subpoenaing of witnesses, that to require defendants to go to trial within the established speedy trial deadline would be unreasonable to expect adequate preparation for pretrial and trial. ORDERED: Counsel directed to chambers to schedule a status conference no later than July 15, 2007. ORDERED: Defendants are REMANDED to the custody of the U.S. Marshal. 4:45 p.m. COURT IN RECESS 167 minutes

Total in court time: Hearing concluded

Case 1:03-cr-00495-WDM

Document 409

Filed 04/26/2007

Page 6 of 6