Free Letter - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1 :04-cv-01338-JJF Document 1111 Filed 08/01 /2008 Page 1 of 1
BOUCHARD MARGULES 5 FRIEDLANDER
A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
Sutra I 4OO
22 2 DELAwARE Avzuuz
Wn.Mm0T¤N, D:LAwARz I 980 I
(302) sro-asoo
FAX (302) sro-ason
DAVID J. MARQULES August 1 D|RECT DIAL
’ (aca) 57::-asso
DMARGULES@BMF·LAW.COM
VIA CM/ECF FILING
The Honorable Joseph J. Faman, Jr.
United States District Court
For the District of Delaware
844 North King Street
Wilmington, DE 19808
Re: Honeywell International, Inc., et al. v. Apple Computer, Inc., et al.
C.A. No. 04-1338-JJF (Consolidated)
Dear Judge Faman:
We write on behalf of Defendants Citizen Watch Co., Ltd. and Citizen Displays Co., Ltd.
(collectively “Citizen") in the above-referenced matter. On July 30, we wrote to the Court in
connection with our pending Motion for Summary Judgment. We inadvertently sent an early
draii of the letter, rather than the final version, for which we apologize to the Court and counsel.
Rather than requesting that a hearing be scheduled, it was our intent state that, if the
Court believes an oral hearing would facilitate a resolution of Citizen’s Motion, Citizen requests
that the Court so inform the parties, at which time, if the Court deems it appropriate, Citizen
would be pleased to work with Honeywell to identify several potential hearing dates from which
the Court could select one.
We received the Court’s Order referring "all matters through and including Summary
Judgment" to the Special Master. Accordingly, we are copying the Special Master.
· Respectfully submitted, I
David J. Margalyg/K6
(Bar No. 225
cc: Clerk of the Court (by CM/ECF)
All Counsel of Record (by CM/ECF)
The Honorable Vincent J. Poppiti (by CM/ECF) ,
{BMF-W0103206.}