Free Answer to Complaint - District Court of California - California


File Size: 23.2 kB
Pages: 6
Date: April 25, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 1,673 Words, 10,217 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/205774/13.pdf

Download Answer to Complaint - District Court of California ( 23.2 kB)


Preview Answer to Complaint - District Court of California
Case 3:08-cv-00891-MEJ

Document 13

Filed 04/25/2008

Page 1 of 6

1 EDMUND G. BROWN JR. Attorney General of the State of California 2 RANDALL P. BORCHERDING Supervising Deputy Attorney General 3 KAREN W. YIU, State Bar No. 230710 Deputy Attorney General 455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000 4 San Francisco, CA 94102-7004 Telephone: (415) 703-5385 5 Fax: (415) 703-5480 Email: [email protected] 6 7 Attorneys for Defendant Franchise Tax Board 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 The Franchise Tax Board ("FTB") hereby submits its answer to the allegations of the v. JESUS MARQUEZ, OLGA MARQUEZ, RAMON MARQUEZ, JUANITA MARQUEZ, TAQUERIA LOS PRIMOS, TAQUERIA LOS PRIMOS NO. 2, LUIS GALINDO, MARTHA GALINDO, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., STATE OF CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, STATE OF CALIFORNIA EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, SAN MATEO COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR, Defendants. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, CV 08-0891 CW DEFENDANT FRANCHISE TAX BOARD'S ANSWER TO COMPLAINT IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

24 Complaint as follows: 25 1. Answering the allegations of paragraphs 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 13 and 14, the FTB admits the

26 allegations. 27 2. Answering the allegations of paragraphs 2, 10, 11, 16, 18, 19, 21, 22, 24, 25, 27, 28,

28 31, 33, 35, 37 and 38, the FTB lacks sufficient information or belief to answer the allegations
Defendant FTB's Answer to Complaint United States v. Jesus Marquez, et al CV 08-0891 CW

1

Case 3:08-cv-00891-MEJ

Document 13

Filed 04/25/2008

Page 2 of 6

1 and, basing its denial on that ground, denies each and every allegation in paragraphs 2, 10, 11, 2 16, 18, 19, 21, 22, 24, 25, 27, 28, 31, 33, 35, 37 and 38 of the Complaint. 3 3. Answering the allegations of paragraph 8, the FTB admits the allegations except that

4 the FTB denies that defendant Taqueria Los Primos No. 2 is currently located at 376 Ellsworth 5 Avenue, San Mateo, California 94401. The FTB is informed and believes and based on such 6 information and belief alleges that the correct address of defendant Taqueria Los Primos No. 2 is 7 376 S. Ellsworth Avenue, San Mateo, California 94401. 8 4. Answering the allegations of paragraph 9, the FTB admits that the property subject to

9 the suit is 791 South Johnston Street, Half Moon Bay, California 94019. Except as expressly 10 admitted herein, the FTB lacks sufficient information or belief to answer the remaining 11 allegations, and, basing its denial on that ground, denies the remaining allegations. 12 5. Answering the allegations of paragraph 12, the FTB admits the allegations except that

13 the FTB denies that John Davies is the FTB's Chief Counsel. The FTB alleges that now 14 Geoffrey Way is the FTB's Chief Counsel. 15 6. Answering the allegations of paragraph 15, the FTB denies the allegation on the

16 ground that there is no California state agency titled the California Department of Labor. The 17 FTB alleges that the California state agency which regulates labor and employment issues is the 18 Department of Industrial Relations (DIR). The FTB further alleges that the DIR is located at 455 19 Golden Gate Avenue, 9th Floor, San Francisco, California 94102 and that the Division of Labor 20 Standards Enforcement is one of the divisions of the DIR. Additionally, the FTB lacks sufficient 21 information or belief to answer the allegation as to whether the DIR is made a party pursuant to 22 26 U.S.C. ยง 7403(b) in that it may claim an interest in the property described in paragraph 9 of 23 the Complaint and, basing its denial on that ground, denies the allegation beginning on line 5 24 with the words "and is made" and ending on line 7 with the words "paragraph 9." 25 7. Answering the allegation of paragraph 17, the FTB incorporates its respective prior

26 answers to paragraphs 1 through 16 as though fully set forth in this answer. 27 8. Answering the allegations of paragraph 20, the FTB incorporates its respective prior

28 answers to paragraph 1 through 19 as though fully set forth in this answer.
Defendant FTB's Answer to Complaint United States v. Jesus Marquez, et al CV 08-0891 CW

2

Case 3:08-cv-00891-MEJ

Document 13

Filed 04/25/2008

Page 3 of 6

1 9.

Answering the allegations of paragraph 23, the FTB incorporates its respective prior

2 answers to paragraph 1 through 22 as though fully set forth in this answer. 3 10. Answering the allegations of paragraph 26, the FTB incorporates its respective prior

4 answers to paragraph 1 through 25 as though fully set forth in this answer. 5 11. Answering the allegations of paragraph 29, the FTB incorporates its respective prior

6 answers to paragraph 1 through 28 as though fully set forth in this answer. 7 12. Answering the allegations of paragraph 30, the FTB admits the allegations beginning

8 on line 27 with the words "Pursuant to 26" and ending on line 1 with the words "Jesus and Olga 9 Marquez." Except as expressly admitted herein, the FTB lacks sufficient information or belief to 10 answer the remaining allegations in paragraph 30, and, basing its denial on that ground, denies 11 each and every remaining allegation. 12 13. Answering the allegations of paragraph 32, the FTB admits the allegations beginning

13 on line 6 with the words "Pursuant to 26" and ending on line 8 with the words "Ramon and 14 Juanita Marquez." Except as expressly admitted herein, the FTB lacks sufficient information or 15 belief to answer the remaining allegations in paragraph 32, and, basing its denial on that ground, 16 denies each and every remaining allegation. 17 14. Answering the allegations of paragraph 34, the FTB admits the allegations beginning

18 on line 13 with the words "Pursuant to 26" and ending on line 15 to 16 with the words "Jesus 19 Marquez and Ramon Marquez." Except as expressly admitted herein, the FTB lacks sufficient 20 information or belief to answer the remaining allegations in paragraph 34, and, basing its denial 21 on that ground, denies each and every remaining allegation. 22 15. Answering the allegations of paragraph 36, the FTB admits the allegations beginning

23 on line 20 with the words "Pursuant to 26" and ending on line 22 to 23 with the words "Jesus 24 Marquez and Ramon Marquez." Except as expressly admitted herein, the FTB lacks sufficient 25 information or belief to answer the remaining allegations in paragraph 36, and, basing its denial 26 on that ground, denies each and every remaining allegation. 27 28 1. WHEREFORE, defendant FTB, prays for the following relief: That the tax liens of the United States be foreclosed against the real property of Jesus
United States v. Jesus Marquez, et al CV 08-0891 CW

Defendant FTB's Answer to Complaint

3

Case 3:08-cv-00891-MEJ

Document 13

Filed 04/25/2008

Page 4 of 6

1 Marquez, Olga Marquez, Ramon Marquez and Juanita Marquez and the real property sold. 2 2. That this Court determine the relative priorities of the liens of the lienholder parties to

3 this suit and order payment of the tax liens of the Franchise Tax Board from the proceeds of the 4 foreclosure sale of the real property of defendants Jesus Marquez, Olga Marquez, Ramon 5 Marquez and Juanita Marquez. 6 3. 7 4. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Defendant FTB's Answer to Complaint United States v. Jesus Marquez, et al CV 08-0891 CW
40242633.wpd SF2008401215

That the Franchise Tax Board be granted its costs. For such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper. Dated: April 25, 2008 Respectfully submitted, EDMUND G. BROWN JR. Attorney General of the State of California RANDALL P. BORCHERDING Supervising Deputy Attorney General /s/ Karen W. Yiu KAREN W. YIU Deputy Attorney General Attorneys for Defendant Franchise Tax Board

4

Case 3:08-cv-00891-MEJ

Document 13

Filed 04/25/2008

Page 5 of 6

DECLARATION OF SERVICE BY U.S. MAIL Case Name: No.: United States of America v. Jesus Marquez, et al.

C08-0891 CW

I declare: I am employed in the Office of the Attorney General, which is the office of a member of the California State Bar, at which member's direction this service is made. I am 18 years of age or older and not a party to this matter. I am familiar with the business practice at the Office of the Attorney General for collection and processing of correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service. In accordance with that practice, correspondence placed in the internal mail collection system at the Office of the Attorney General is deposited with the United States Postal Service that same day in the ordinary course of business. On April 25, 2008, I served the attached DEFENDANT FRANCHISE TAX BOARD'S ANSWER TO COMPLAINT by placing a true copy thereof enclosed in a sealed envelope with postage thereon fully prepaid, in the internal mail collection system at the Office of the Attorney General at 455 Golden Gate Avenue, Suite 11000, San Francisco, CA 94102-7004, addressed as follows:

David L. Denier United States Attorney's Office - San Francisco Tax Division, 9th Floor 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055 San Francisco, CA 94102 Robert A. Goldstein Cindy Lan Ho Law Office of Robert L. Goldstein 100 Bush Street, Suite 501 San Francisco, CA 94104 Todd M. Bailey Tax Counsel Franchise Tax Board P. O. Box 1720, MS: A-260 Rancho Cordova, CA 95741-1720

Eugene Whitlock San Mateo County Counsel's Office 400 County Center, 6th Floor Redwood City, CA 94063 Ralph Roberts Employment Development Department Special Procedures Section, MIC 92S P.O. Box 826880 Sacramento, CA 94280-0001 Victoria C. Baker Board of Equalization - Legal Division P.O. box 942879, MIC: 82 Sacramento, CA 94279-0055 Merly R. Dino Special Procedures Section Board of Equalization P.O. Box 942879, MIC: 55 Sacramento, CA 94279-0055

Case 3:08-cv-00891-MEJ

Document 13

Filed 04/25/2008

Page 6 of 6

I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on April 25, 2008, at San Francisco, California.

Sylvia S. Wu Declarant
40246364.wpd SF2008401215

/s/ Sylvia S. Wu Signature