Free Motion for Extension of Time to File - District Court of California - California


File Size: 36.5 kB
Pages: 2
Date: May 6, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 344 Words, 2,153 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/205333/8.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time to File - District Court of California ( 36.5 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time to File - District Court of California
Case 3:08-cv-00995-PJH

Document 8

Filed 05/06/2008

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

David Fink (pro hac vice) 7519 Apache Plume Houston, TX 77071 Tele. 713 729-4991 Fax. 713 729-4951 [email protected] Duncan M. McNeill 1514 Van Dyke Avenue San Francisco, CA 94124 Tele. 415 752-5063 [email protected] Fed. Bar No. 136416 Attorneys for Plaintiff , JAMES B. GOODMAN UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 OAKLAND DIVISION 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JAMES B. GOODMAN Plaintiff, ) ) ) v. ) ) ETRON TECHNOLOGY AMERICA, ) INC. ) ) Defendant. ) ) __________________________________ ) ) CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-00995 WBD MOTION (AND PROPOSED ORDER) TO CONTINUE THE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

This is a Motion by the Plaintiff to continue the Initial Case Management Conference 60 days from the present date of March 19, 2008. This is the first request to extend the date. The additional time is needed because the Defendant did not accept the request for a waiver of service within the time allowed; however, an informal discussion with the
M OTION TO CONTINUE THE INITIAL CASE M ANAGEM ENT CONFERENCE
JAMES B. GOODMAN V. ETRON TECHNOLOGY AMERICA, INC. CASE NO. 08-00995 WDB

1

Case 3:08-cv-00995-PJH

Document 8

Filed 05/06/2008

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

soon to be appointed attorney for the Defendant indicated that service would be accepted by email, and that the Defendant would like to discuss a settlement prior to the Initial Case Management Conference. Additional time before the Initial Case Management Conference might save legal expenses for both parties, as well as a savings of judicial resources. Respectfully Submitted

/s/David Fink David Fink Attorney for Plaintiff FuzzySharp Technologies Incorporated The Court has considered the foregoing Motion and hereby modifies the date for the Initial Case Management Conference to

Date: 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
M OTION TO CONTINUE THE INITIAL CASE M ANAGEM ENT CONFERENCE
JAMES B. GOODMAN V. ETRON TECHNOLOGY AMERICA, INC. CASE NO. 08-00995 WDB

Magistrate Judge Wayne D. Brazil

2