Free Proposed Order - District Court of California - California


File Size: 41.4 kB
Pages: 3
Date: September 3, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 754 Words, 4,744 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/204837/13.pdf

Download Proposed Order - District Court of California ( 41.4 kB)


Preview Proposed Order - District Court of California
Case 3:08-mj-70400-MEJ

Document 13

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 1 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO (CABN 44332) United States Attorney BRIAN J. STRETCH(CABN 163973) Chief, Criminal Division W.S. WILSON LEUNG (CABN 190939) Assistant United States Attorney 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055 San Francisco, California 94102-3495 Telephone: (415) 436-6758 FAX: (415) 436-6753 Attorneys for the United States of America UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 12 13 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 With the agreement of the parties, and with the consent of the defendant, the Court enters this order vacating the preliminary hearing date of September 5, 2008, setting a new preliminary hearing date on September 23, 2008, at 9:30 a.m., before the duty magistrate judge, extending the time for the preliminary hearing under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5.1, and excluding time under the Speedy Trial Act from the date of this stipulation to September 23, 2008. The parties agree and stipulate, and the Court finds and holds, as follows: 1. The defendant, Douglas Largaespada, was charged in a complaint dated July 2, DOUGLAS LARGAESPADA, a/k/a "Droopy," Defendant. v. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 3-08-70400 MEJ STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER DOCUMENTING WAIVER

2008 with one count of assault with a dangerous weapon in aid of racketeering, in violation of 18

Case 3:08-mj-70400-MEJ

Document 13

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 2 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

U.S.C. §§ 1959(a)(3) and 2, and one count of attempted murder in aid of racketeering, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1959(a)(5) and 2. Largaespada was transferred into federal custody on July 3, 2008, and presented to Magistrate Judge Maria-Elena James on that day. On July 8, 2008, Largaespada appeared before Magistrate Judge Vadas and Gail Shifman, Esq., was appointed to represent him. Magistrate Judge Vadas also scheduled a detention hearing for July 15, 2008. The defendant remained detained pending further proceedings. 2. Following the appointment of Ms. Shifman on July 8, 2008, the parties conferred

regarding possible dispositions of this matter. Ms. Shifman, however, subsequently withdrew as counsel for the defendant, and on July 23, 2008, Magistrate Judge James appointed Erik Babcock, Esq., to represent the defendant. 3. Since Mr. Babcock's entry into this matter, he has been conferring with both the

defendant as well as the Government regarding this matter. Because this case concerns complicated issues relating to the federal racketeering laws, these discussions have been lengthy. As a result, the parties asked, the Court granted, an extension of the preliminary hearing date to September 5, 2008, pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5.1, and excluded the time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161. 4. The parties have continued to pursue their discussions but require additional time

to address fully some of the issues presented. Accordingly, the parties respectfully request an additional extension of the preliminary hearing date, from September 5, 2008 to September 23, 2008, at 9:30 am, for this purpose to ensure the effective preparation of counsel. 5. Taking into the account the public interest in the prompt disposition of criminal

cases, the above-stated ground is good cause for extending the time limit for a preliminary hearing under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5.1, for the filing period for an indictment, and for excluding time under the Speedy Trial Act. Failure to grant the continuance would deny the defense time for effective preparation and for seeking disposition of this matter on agreed-upon terms. 6. Accordingly, with the consent of the defendant, the Court hereby: (a) vacates the

September 5, 2008 preliminary hearing date and extends the time for a preliminary hearing until

-2-

Case 3:08-mj-70400-MEJ

Document 13

Filed 09/03/2008

Page 3 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

September 23, 2008, before the duty magistrate judge, at 9:30 a.m.; and (b) orders that the period from September 5, 2008 to September 23, 2008 be excluded from the time period for preliminary hearings under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 5.1 and from Speedy Trial Act calculations under 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(8)(A) & (B)(iv).

STIPULATED:

DATED:

September 3, 2008

/s/ ERIK BABCOCK, ESQ. Attorney for DOUGLAS LARGAESPADA

DATED:

September 3, 2008

/s/ W.S. WILSON LEUNG Assistant United States Attorney

IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 DATED: 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 September ____, 2008 HON. ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE United States Magistrate Judge

-3-