Case 5:03-cv-04669-JW
Document 250
Filed 09/13/2004
Page 1 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Gary M. Hoffman (Pro Hac Vice) Kenneth W. Brothers (Pro Hac Vice) DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO MORIN & OSHINSKY, LLP 2101 L Street, NW Washington, DC 20037-1526 Phone (202) 785-9700 Fax (202) 887-0689 Edward A. Meilman (Pro Hac Vice) DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO MORIN & OSHINSKY, LLP 1177 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10036-2714 Phone (212) 835-1400 Fax (212) 997-9880 Jeffrey B. Demain, State Bar No. 126715 Jonathan Weissglass, State Bar No. 185008 ALTSHULER, BERZON, NUSSBAUM, RUBIN & DEMAIN 177 Post Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, California 94108 Phone (415) 421-7151 Fax (415) 362-8064 Attorneys for Ricoh Company, Ltd. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION RICOH COMPANY, LTD., Plaintiff, vs. AEROFLEX INCORPORATED, et al., Defendants. SYNOPSYS, INC., Plaintiff, vs. RICOH COMPANY, LTD., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )) CASE NO. C-03-4669-MJJ (EMC) CASE NO. C-03-2289-MJJ (EMC) [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING TIMING OF RICOH'S MISCELLANEOUS ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST
CASE NO. CV-03-4669-and 2289 MJJ (EMC) - Page 1 [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING TIMING OF RICHO'S MISCELLANEOUS ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST
Case 5:03-cv-04669-JW
Document 250
Filed 09/13/2004
Page 2 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
This Court having reviewed the miscellaneous administrative request by plaintiff and declaratory judgment defendant Ricoh Co., Ltd. ("Ricoh") regarding the Markman brief filed by the ASIC Defendants and Synopsys (collectively "Synopsys") on September 10, 2004, it is HEREBY ORDERED: Synopsys shall file and serve a substantive response by noon (P.D.T.) Wednesday. A telephone hearing shall be held on September ___, 2004 at ________ (a.m.) (p.m.) SO ORDERED. _______________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT September __, 2004
CASE NO. CV-03-4669-and 2289 MJJ (EMC) - Page 2 [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING TIMING OF RICHO'S MISCELLANEOUS ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST