Free Notice (Other) - District Court of California - California


File Size: 95.9 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 440 Words, 2,753 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/197268/161.pdf

Download Notice (Other) - District Court of California ( 95.9 kB)


Preview Notice (Other) - District Court of California
Case 3:07-cv-04161-WHA

Document 161

Filed 07/02/2008

Page 1 of 2

1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP Claude M. Stern (Bar No. 96737) 2 Todd M. Briggs (Bar No. 209282) 555 Twin Dolphin Drive, Suite 560 3 Redwood Shores, California 94065-2139 Telephone: (650) 801-5000 4 Facsimile: (650) 801-5100 Email: [email protected] 5 [email protected] 6 Attorneys for RIVERBED TECHNOLOGY, INC. 7 8 9 10 11 RIVERBED TECHNOLOGY, INC., 12 13 vs. Counterclaimant, CASE NO. C 07-4161 WHA NOTICE OF MANUAL FILING UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14 QUANTUM CORPORATION, 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Case No. C 07-04161 WHA

Counterdefendant. QUANTUM CORPORATION, Counterclaimant, vs. RIVERBED TECHNOLOGY, INC., Counterdefendant.

-1-

NOTICE OF MANUAL FILING

Case 3:07-cv-04161-WHA

Document 161

Filed 07/02/2008

Page 2 of 2

1

Pursuant to General Order 45 (Section VII), Local Rule 79-5(d), and the Protective Order

2 in this action, Riverbed Technology, Inc. ("Riverbed") hereby provides notice that the following 3 documents are being filed in paper form in the Clerk's Office. These documents are being 4 manually filed because Quantum Corporation ("Quantum") has designated information in these 5 documents confidential under the protective order that governs this action. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 · Exhibits G and H to the Supplemental Declaration of Todd M. Briggs In Support Of Riverbed's Reply In Support Of Riverbed's Motion For Summary Judgment Of (1) Validity Of Claims 26 And 27 Of U.S. Patent 7,116,249 Under 35 U.S.C. § 102, (2) Validity Of All Asserted Claims of U.S. Patent 7,116,249 Under 35 U.S.C. § 103, And (3) Validity Of All Asserted Claims of U.S. Patent 7,116,249 Under 35 U.S.C. § 112, And Opposition to Quantum Corporation's Motion for Leave To Amend Its Preliminary Invalidity Contentions (containing information designated confidential by Quantum under the protective order). · Riverbed's Reply In Support Of Riverbed's Motion For Summary Judgment Of (1) Validity Of Claims 26 And 27 Of U.S. Patent 7,116,249 Under 35 U.S.C. § 102, (2) Validity Of All Asserted Claims of U.S. Patent 7,116,249 Under 35 U.S.C. § 103, And (3) Validity Of All Asserted Claims of U.S. Patent 7,116,249 Under 35 U.S.C. § 112, And Opposition to Quantum Corporation's Motion for Leave To Amend Its Preliminary Invalidity Contentions (containing information designated confidential by Quantum under the protective order).

16 Respectfully submitted, 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Case No. C 07-04161 WHA

July 2, 2008

QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES, LLP /s/ Todd M. Briggs Todd M. Briggs Attorneys for RIVERBED TECHNOLOGY, INC.

-2-

NOTICE OF MANUAL FILING