Free Order - District Court of California - California


File Size: 25.4 kB
Pages: 2
Date: November 28, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 481 Words, 2,706 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/194001/12-1.pdf

Download Order - District Court of California ( 25.4 kB)


Preview Order - District Court of California
Case 3:07-cv-03619-WHA

Document 12

Filed 11/28/2007

Page 1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RELATED CASE ORDER A Motion for Administrative Relief to Consider Whether Cases Should be Related or a Sua Sponte Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship (Civil L.R. 3-12) has been filed. The time for filing an opposition or statement of support has passed. As the judge assigned to the earliest filed case below that bears my initials, I find that the more recently filed case(s) that I have initialed below are related to the case assigned to me, and such case(s) shall be reassigned to me. Any cases listed below that are not related to the case assigned to me are referred to the judge assigned to the next-earliest filed case for a related case determination. C 07-00062 WHA C 07-03619 WHA
De La Vega v. Department of Public Health et al De La Vega v. Bureau of Diplomatic Security, San Francisco Field Office, U.S. Department of State
WHA

I find that the above case is related to the case assigned to me.

C 07-05734 JL

CTS. De la Vega v. Bureau of Diplomatic Security, San Francisco Field Office, U.S. Department of State
WHA

I find that the above case is related to the case assigned to me.

C 07-05735 MMC

Eowyn Cts. Vbb. De La Vega v. Office of the Presidency of the United States of America
WHA

I find that the above case is related to the case assigned to me.

ORDER Counsel are instructed that all future filings in any reassigned case are to bear the initials of the newly assigned judge immediately after the case number. Any case management conference in any reassigned case will be rescheduled by the Court. The parties shall adjust the dates for the conference, disclosures and report required by FRCivP 16 and 26 accordingly. Unless otherwise ordered, any dates for hearing noticed motions are vacated and must be renoticed by the moving party before the newly assigned judge; any deadlines set by the ADR Local Rules remain in effect; and any deadlines established in a case management order continue to govern, except dates for appearance in court, which will be rescheduled by the newly assigned judge. Dated: November 27, 2007 Judge William H. Alsup -1-

Case 3:07-cv-03619-WHA

Document 12

Filed 11/28/2007

Page 2 of 2

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I certify that on the date stated below, I lodged a copy of this order with each judicial officer and I mailed a copy to each counsel of record or pro se party in the cases listed above. Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

DATED:

November 28, 2007

By: Deputy Clerk

Copies to: Courtroom Deputies Case Systems Administrators Counsel of Record Entered into Assignment Program:

(date)

-2-