Free Order - District Court of California - California

Case 4:07-cv-03010-CW

Document 46

Filed 03/13/2008

Page 1 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17

JAMES POOLEY (CA SBN 58041) L. SCOTT OLIVER (CA SBN 174824) DIANA LUO (CA SBN 233712) KATHERINE NOLAN-STEVAUX (CA SBN 244950) MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP 755 Page Mill Road Palo Alto, California 94304-1018 Telephone: (650) 813-5600 Facsimile: (650) 494-0792 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Attorneys for Plaintiff OPTOVUE CORPORATION and Counterdefendants OPTOVUE CORPORATION, JAY WEI and YONGHUA ZHAO DONALD L. BARTELS #65142 BRUCE E. COPELAND #124888 NIXON PEABODY LLP One Embarcadero Center, 18th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-3600 Telephone: (415) 984-8200 Facsimile: (415) 984-8300 [email protected] [email protected] Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant CARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

18 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA - OAKLAND DIVISION 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: CONTINUANCE OF ADR DATE­ CASE NO. C 07-03010 CW pa-1239759

OPTOVUE CORPORATION, a California Corporation, Plaintiff, v. CARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC., a New York Corporation, Defendant. AND RELATED COUNTERACTION.

Case No.

C 07-03010 CW

STIPULATION AND ORDER REGARDING CONTINUANCE OF DATE OF ADR COMPLETION

The Honorable Claudia Wilken

Case 4:07-cv-03010-CW

Document 46

Filed 03/13/2008

Page 2 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: CONTINUANCE OF ADR DATE­ CASE NO. C 07-03010 CW pa-1239759

Pursuant to Northern District Local Rule 7-12, Optovue Corporation and Carl Zeiss Meditec, Inc. (collectively "the Parties") hereby jointly submit this stipulation regarding a continuance of the date by which the parties must complete ADR: WHEREAS, on October 25, 2007, the Court issued a Case Management Order setting April 15, 2008 as the date by which ADR must be completed; WHEREAS, the parties are currently scheduled to appear before Mark D. Petersen for mediation on March 20, 2008; WHEREAS, both parties are diligently conducting discovery and agree that further discovery is necessary in order to have a productive mediation; WHEREAS, both parties and the mediator are currently available on April 24, 2008; IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the Parties, and through their respective attorneys of record, as follows: The Court shall continue the date by which ADR must be completed to April 30, 2008; The parties shall in good faith appear before Mr. Petersen for mediation on or about April 24, 2008 (subject to Mr. Petersen's continuing availability).

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

2

Case 4:07-cv-03010-CW

Document 46

Filed 03/13/2008

Page 3 of 4

1 2 3

Dated: March 11, 2008

JAMES POOLEY L. SCOTT OLIVER DIANA LUO KATHERINE NOLAN-STEVAUX MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

4 5 By: 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: CONTINUANCE OF ADR DATE­ CASE NO. C 07-03010 CW pa-1239759

/s/Diana Luo Diana Luo Attorneys for Plaintiff OPTOVUE CORPORATION and Counterdefendants OPTOVUE CORPORATION, INC.; JAY WEI and YONGHUA ZHAO

Dated: March 11, 2008

DONALD L. BARTELS BRUCE E. COPELAND LAURA K. CARTER NIXON PEABODY LLP

By:

/s/ Donald L. Bartels Donald L. Bartels Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant CARL ZEISS MEDITEC, INC.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

3/13/08 DATED: The Honorable Claudia Wilken United States District Judge

3

Case 4:07-cv-03010-CW

Document 46

Filed 03/13/2008

Page 4 of 4

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 By: 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: CONTINUANCE OF ADR DATE­ CASE NO. C 07-03010 CW pa-1239759

I, Diana Luo, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file this Stipulation Regarding Continuance of Date of ADR Completion. In compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Donald L. Bartels has concurred in this filing.

Dated: March 11, 2008

Morrison & Foerster LLP

/s/ Diana Luo Diana Luo Attorneys for Plaintiff OPTOVUE CORPORATION and Counterdefendants OPTOVUE CORPORATION, INC.; JAY WEI and YONGHUA ZHAO

4