Free Proposed Order - District Court of California - California


File Size: 54.4 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 374 Words, 2,512 Characters
Page Size: 612 x 790.8 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/192903/79.pdf

Download Proposed Order - District Court of California ( 54.4 kB)


Preview Proposed Order - District Court of California
Case 4:07-cv—O2684-CW Document 79 — Filed O7/24/2008 Page 1 of 2
1 Jess B. Millikan, SBN 095540 l l _ I
Samuel H. Ruby, SBN 191091 - .
2 Judith A. Whitehouse, SBN 198176 A - `
Bullivant Houser Bailey PC _
3 601 California Street, Suite 1800 . ` . ‘ o . ·
San Francisco, California 94108
4 Telephone: 4l5.352.2700 . .
Facsimile: 415.352.2701 _ A ` _
5 [email protected] A
[email protected] . I
6 [email protected] ` A u . . .
7 Attorneys for Defendant · I in l I A
United States Fire Insurance Companv »
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA `
10 ‘
OAKLAND DIVISION
11
12 COPART INC., Case No.: C 07 2684 CW (EDL)
13 Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] l A
14 vs. l - ORDER: ·
15 CRUM & FORSTER INDEMNITY A (1) GRANTING DEFENDANT’S I
COMPANYI, UNITED STATES FIRE I MOTION FOR SUMMARY
16 INSURANCE COMPANY, and DOES 1-10, - JUDGMENT ON PLAINTIFF’S
. COMPLAINT;
17 Defendants. _
A (2) DISMISSING AS MOOT
18 _ DEFENDANT’S COUNTERCLAIM
FOR REFORMATION; AND
19 V
A (3) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
20 FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
21 ‘
Date: August 21, 2008
22 . Time: 2:00 p.m.
23 . Action File: March 20, 2007
Trial Date: A November 10, 2008
24 AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIM
25 · V A
26
27
28 ———— ———
I Dismissed by Order Upon Stipulation (6/15/07).
[PROPOSED] ORDER — Case No.: C07 2684 CW (EDL)

Case 4:O7—cv-02684-CW Document 79 Filed O7/24/2008 Page 2 of 2 .
1 p The parties have filed cross-motions for summary judgment. Defendanfs objections to `
2 plaintiffs evidence are SUSTAINED. Having considered all of the admissible evidence and
3 argtunent, the Court rules as follows: ‘ _ I
4 .
5 1. Defendanfs motion for summary judgment on plaintiffs complaint is GRANTED.
6 Plaintiff s complaint is hereby DISMISSED. »
7 2. In light ofthe dismissal of plaintiffs complaint, defendant’s counterclaim for
8 reformation is DISMISSED as moot.
9 - 3. Plaintiff s motion for summary judgment is DENIED.
1 0 I _ .
I 11 Defendant’s counterclaim for negligent misrepresentation and concealment remains set
12 for trial. l
13
14 IT IS SO ORDERED.
1 5 I V
i 16 Dated: _
17 I
18 . .
1 9
20 I
21 I
22
23
24 p
25
26 I _
27
28

Case 4:07-cv-02684-CW

Document 79

Filed 07/24/2008

Page 1 of 2

Case 4:07-cv-02684-CW

Document 79

Filed 07/24/2008

Page 2 of 2