Free Proposed Order - District Court of California - California


File Size: 15.6 kB
Pages: 2
Date: June 25, 2007
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 296 Words, 1,927 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/192444/43.pdf

Download Proposed Order - District Court of California ( 15.6 kB)


Preview Proposed Order - District Court of California
Case 3:07-cv-02769-JL

Document 43

Filed 06/25/2007

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13

HARVEY SISKIND LLP D. PETER HARVEY (SBN 55712) e-mail: [email protected] SETH I. APPEL (SBN 233421) e-mail: [email protected] Four Embarcadero Center, 39th Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 354-0100 Facsimile: (415) 391-7124 Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants SEOK KI KIM and STV ASIA, LTD.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION FRANK NEMIROFSKY, Plaintiff, Case No.: C 07 2769 JL [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE MOTION TO EXTEND THE TEMPORARY PROTECTIVE ORDER

14 v. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Counterdefendant. 24 25 26 27 28 v. FRANK NEMIROFSKY, SEOK KI KIM; STV ASIA, LTD., a British Virgin Islands corporation; and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive, Defendants. SEOK KI KIM and STV ASIA, LTD., a British Virgin Islands corporation, Counterclaimants,

[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE MOTION TO EXTEND THE TEMPORARY PROTECTIVE ORDER

Case No.: C 07 2769 JL

Case 3:07-cv-02769-JL

Document 43

Filed 06/25/2007

Page 2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Frank Nemirofsky ("Plaintiff") filed an Ex Parte Motion to Extend the Temporary Protective Order on Friday, June 22, 2007. Defendants and Counterclaimants Seok Ki Kim and STV Asia, Ltd. ("Defendants") filed an opposition on Monday, June 25, 2007. Good cause appearing therefor, it is hereby ordered that Plaintiff's motion is DENIED in full for the reasons stated in Defendants' opposition. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: ____________________ ___________________________________ Chief Magistrate Judge James Larson United States District Court

-1[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S EX PARTE MOTION TO EXTEND THE TEMPORARY PROTECTIVE ORDER

Case No.: C 07 2769 JL