Free Declaration in Support - District Court of California - California


File Size: 2,933.3 kB
Pages: 43
Date: February 25, 2008
File Format: PDF
State: California
Category: District Court of California
Author: unknown
Word Count: 941 Words, 5,121 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/cand/192406/119.pdf

Download Declaration in Support - District Court of California ( 2,933.3 kB)


Preview Declaration in Support - District Court of California
Case 3:07-cv-02748-MHP

Document 119

Filed 02/25/2008

Page 1 of 43

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

HARVEY SISKIND LLP IAN K. BOYD (State Bar No. 191434) [email protected] SETH I. APPEL (State Bar No. 233421) [email protected] RAFFI V. ZEROUNIAN (State Bar No. 236388) [email protected] Four Embarcadero Center, 39th Floor San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 354-0100 Facsimile: (415) 391-7124 Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant Mark Lillge d/b/a Creative Marketing Concepts IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION MARK LILLGE d/b/a CREATIVE MARKETING CONCEPTS, Plaintiff, v. ANDREW VERITY and CHRISTINA CHANG, Date: March 31, 2008 Time: 2:00 p.m. Court: Hon. Marilyn Hall Patel Case No. C 07-02748 MHP DECLARATION OF IAN K. BOYD IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO STRIKE EXPERT REPORT OF MILES LOCKER

Defendants.

ANDREW VERITY and CHRISTINA CHANG, Counterclaimants, v. MARK LILLGE d/b/a CREATIVE MARKETING CONCEPTS, and DOES 1-10, Counterdefendants.
BOYD DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO STRIKE LOCKER REPORT Case No. C 07-02748 MHP

Case 3:07-cv-02748-MHP

Document 119

Filed 02/25/2008

Page 2 of 43

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

I, Ian K. Boyd, declare as follows: 1. I am an attorney at the law firm of Harvey Siskind LLP, counsel of record for Plaintiff

and Counterdefendant Mark Lillge d/b/a Creative Marketing Concepts ("CMC"). I have personal knowledge of the matters stated herein, and, if called as a witness, I could and would testify competently thereto. 2. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of the expert report of Miles

Locker, served by Defendants. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed this 25th day of February, 2008, in San Francisco, California.

/s/ Ian K. Boyd

-1BOYD DECLARATION IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO STRIKE LOCKER REPORT

Case No. C 07-02748 MHP

Case 3:07-cv-02748-MHP

Document 119

Filed 02/25/2008

Page 3 of 43

EXHIBIT A TO THE DECLARATION OF IAN K. BOYD IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO STRIKE EXPERT REPORT OF MILES LOCKER

Case 3:07-cv-02748-MHP

Document 119

Filed 02/25/2008

Page 4 of 43

Case 3:07-cv-02748-MHP

Document 119

Filed 02/25/2008

Page 5 of 43

Case 3:07-cv-02748-MHP

Document 119

Filed 02/25/2008

Page 6 of 43

Case 3:07-cv-02748-MHP

Document 119

Filed 02/25/2008

Page 7 of 43

Case 3:07-cv-02748-MHP

Document 119

Filed 02/25/2008

Page 8 of 43

Case 3:07-cv-02748-MHP

Document 119

Filed 02/25/2008

Page 9 of 43

Case 3:07-cv-02748-MHP

Document 119

Filed 02/25/2008

Page 10 of 43

Case 3:07-cv-02748-MHP

Document 119

Filed 02/25/2008

Page 11 of 43

Case 3:07-cv-02748-MHP

Document 119

Filed 02/25/2008

Page 12 of 43

Case 3:07-cv-02748-MHP

Document 119

Filed 02/25/2008

Page 13 of 43

Case 3:07-cv-02748-MHP

Document 119

Filed 02/25/2008

Page 14 of 43

Case 3:07-cv-02748-MHP

Document 119

Filed 02/25/2008

Page 15 of 43

Case 3:07-cv-02748-MHP

Document 119

Filed 02/25/2008

Page 16 of 43

Case 3:07-cv-02748-MHP

Document 119

Filed 02/25/2008

Page 17 of 43

Case 3:07-cv-02748-MHP

Document 119

Filed 02/25/2008

Page 18 of 43

Case 3:07-cv-02748-MHP

Document 119

Filed 02/25/2008

Page 19 of 43

Case 3:07-cv-02748-MHP

Document 119

Filed 02/25/2008

Page 20 of 43

Case 3:07-cv-02748-MHP

Document 119

Filed 02/25/2008

Page 21 of 43

Case 3:07-cv-02748-MHP

Document 119

Filed 02/25/2008

Page 22 of 43

Case 3:07-cv-02748-MHP

Document 119

Filed 02/25/2008

Page 23 of 43

Case 3:07-cv-02748-MHP

Document 119

Filed 02/25/2008

Page 24 of 43

Case 3:07-cv-02748-MHP

Document 119

Filed 02/25/2008

Page 25 of 43

Case 3:07-cv-02748-MHP

Document 119

Filed 02/25/2008

Page 26 of 43

Case 3:07-cv-02748-MHP

Document 119

Filed 02/25/2008

Page 27 of 43

Case 3:07-cv-02748-MHP

Document 119

Filed 02/25/2008

Page 28 of 43

Case 3:07-cv-02748-MHP

Document 119

Filed 02/25/2008

Page 29 of 43

Case 3:07-cv-02748-MHP

Document 119

Filed 02/25/2008

Page 30 of 43

Case 3:07-cv-02748-MHP

Document 119

Filed 02/25/2008

Page 31 of 43

Case 3:07-cv-02748-MHP

Document 119

Filed 02/25/2008

Page 32 of 43

Case 3:07-cv-02748-MHP

Document 119

Filed 02/25/2008

Page 33 of 43

Case 3:07-cv-02748-MHP

Document 119

Filed 02/25/2008

Page 34 of 43

Case 3:07-cv-02748-MHP

Document 119

Filed 02/25/2008

Page 35 of 43

Case 3:07-cv-02748-MHP

Document 119

Filed 02/25/2008

Page 36 of 43

Case 3:07-cv-02748-MHP

Document 119

Filed 02/25/2008

Page 37 of 43

Case 3:07-cv-02748-MHP

Document 119

Filed 02/25/2008

Page 38 of 43

Case 3:07-cv-02748-MHP

Document 119

Filed 02/25/2008

Page 39 of 43

Case 3:07-cv-02748-MHP

Document 119

Filed 02/25/2008

Page 40 of 43

Case 3:07-cv-02748-MHP

Document 119

Filed 02/25/2008

Page 41 of 43

Case 3:07-cv-02748-MHP

Document 119

Filed 02/25/2008

Page 42 of 43

Case 3:07-cv-02748-MHP

Document 119

Filed 02/25/2008

Page 43 of 43