Case 5:07-cr-00282-RMW
Document 42
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 1 of 3
! RI(JHARP) (: !'HENG (CASRN 1 ?5?9:!)
I
Assistant I; Jnitel t
Statcs Attorncv
i 50 Almadt n BouIevarci San Jose, C tlifornia 951 13 Telephone. ~408) 535-7 136
Facsimile. +OSj 53 5->C'66 k n l i l : liCh;Id,ChCIlg~i?JdUj.gj i
10'
!3?T:'iD I.jT!*TES
ETSTRTCT CC)l.J!?T
11
12
NORTFI!?R?JDDTFTNC'T OF CALFORYIP\
S.CLN JOSE DIVISlC.)i\i
13
1%
WITBD STA
:is OF ~ L ~ I E Z C ~ ~ . )
No.
CR (l7-00282-P~'Il'it'
1~
1
1 1
nefcn? wt.
j
FRO^? TEE S P E E ~ Y TRTAi. ACT CAT Cy.7.AT!ON (13 1J C.C. 3151 (5\(8)(A))
19 11
- ------1 .On Jan lary 28, 2096, the p ~nie.5 appeaxed for a heanng before thls Coun. At that
)
zo
2i
iI
1
I
/
hasi~lg, cieicn ,e C O I I T I regiesteif at;, ~~~ i:xclusifin of time ulrJar thiz Syctdy Tlial Act based upoil
a;!
ii, Jcie;ise
couns..i's
to
. cffeci;~,;, 2::cjja:e by .revtew:ny ihc lxgc mkvut~t maienais; ly
,
.
.
I
hy ? :c ~ ~ v e ; n m c z4. !la: ~,imc, Coun rcr tile :::jifci for s hear-ing v r F c b u m 4, i1 ihc
-
i1
I
.:OOf!,the parti.cs again appeared for a hearing before this Court. 1
26
27
i
i
1
( At that hearin!!: defense counsei : ~ ? a irequested an exclusion of time under the Speedy T r ~ a Act n l
dcfensc belie\ cs i s still ~ i l t j t ~ d ~ l airid10 tornplete disiussions regading loss mouiits for t!\c :,l;,
I
nrt~t.1 ( based upon dt t n s r cou~~srl's ti: c:ummunicate to the Govenurlent, items of discovery the
I
28
1
I
I
i
SzE06EtLLS UEl1:lL 8002 5
o 1 1 a ~ s o 3 v u o s r n o ~ ' y ~ r ~ ~ a w L E : Z O80 SO ~ pan a3aa
------------------
Case 5:07-cr-00282-RMW
Document 42
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 2 of 3
4
5
6
7
II
1 effectwe prqa-atir?o, taking into 3:-count !he c u e r c w of due d ~ l l ~ e n Finally, the partles agree ~e.
! lhat the ends O-'justiceserved by :;,ranting the requested conttnuance outweigh the best lntercsr o i id
1 rcq~!crrcc!ron?nv.vce -?,o:~!ditn.r::.o,sbly i
deny dckgst cn!!grel reacon~hlc !!me nrcessary Br
/
I
II
1
1 [he public. and the delenda!ll in a speedy 1114 in ti,a prompt disposition of onminzi c n i i i . and
E 'd
-
SZE06EtLTS
-
o 1 1 a ~ s o 3 % u o s ? n o l r ~ ~ ~ J J a L E : Z O 80 S O q a j ~~
pan I a3ad
-
we11: 11 800Z S q a j
Case 5:07-cr-00282-RMW
Document 42
Filed 02/07/2008
Page 3 of 3
3
I
1 ORDERS that !he t i ~ bct*.~crn e !~:ui~ry3E 2OCS znd Mxoh -31: 201)s i ~ s c l u d c d under thc
Tr!?! F c, ? T( !!,S.C, $3161 The c01!rt finds tha? !he fail~rreto g ~ ? ! the req!!ec!cc!
l unreasonahlv !:'en11defense co~.tnc! ? reasonable ti.mr: ncresrary for effecrive
II
I
I I 1 I I
5
6
il 11 preparation, ta cing into account t1.11;exclrclse of due diligence.
11 contrnnanc.e w ~
Furthermore, r'he Court finds that
the e11ds ol !us .Ice served by griu~l l ~ 11.x . g !cquasltd coatinualce cjurwe~gh best i r l t t r ~oitthe the ~
8
9
j/ pubhc a i d ibc dcfcndant in
I'
aspr~?~y l mn
and ei ?he prunip: d i ~ p o i i ~ iu~ iciirnhnal cares, il:~ l i
1
1
Gla;rcJrc cuiicludci
ihi:; c a i : ' ~ r i ~ n of':ine shouli be made udic IS i S C .
I
13
i I l4I
l.5
DA~I.ED:
.-
ROSALD M. Wy 1'E x IjZJlI'LD STATES U1S'lGi;-j-JJGp(;E
1
1
I
I
I
I9
20
1 Poston. bI~ss~chusetts 10 021
RI(':HAKDC CHENC; Assistant United States Attvrnzy Anomey for i ialnriii 130 Alrnadcn Boulevard, suite Y ( l l j Salk Jose, Cai, camla 35 !13
i
i
21
22
i
2=
i
iI
i
i I
I
I
SZEOGE~LTS
o ~ ~ a ~ s o 3 v u o s r n o l ~ y ~ r ~ ~ E : Z O 80 SO ~S a w W l : 11 800Z S (lad pan! a3ad