Free Order - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Before the court is "Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' 17 Motion for Summary Judgment" (doc. 43). 18 granted summary judgment in this case, and because Plaintiff 19 argues 20 document as a Motion for Reconsideration. 21 Absent good cause shown, Motions for Reconsideration must 22 be filed no later than ten days after the filing of the Order 23 that is the subject of the motion. 24 granting 25 Plaintiff's request for reconsideration was not filed until 26 July 21, 2005. 27 28
Case 2:04-cv-00653-FJM Document 45 Filed 08/19/2005 Page 1 of 2

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

Moses E. Naone, Plaintiff, vs. Corrections America, Corporation

Defendant.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) of) ) ) ) )

No. 04-CV-653-PHX-FJM ORDER

Because we have

our

decision

is

in

error,

we

will

construe

this

LRCiv 7.2(g). on June

Our Order 27, 2005.

summary

judgment

was

filed

The request is therefore denied as untimely.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Alternatively, even had Plaintiff filed a timely motion we would have denied it for the reasons stated in our Order of June 27, 2005. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, DENYING Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration (doc. 43). DATED this 18th day of August, 2005.

-2Case 2:04-cv-00653-FJM Document 45 Filed 08/19/2005 Page 2 of 2