1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16
WO
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Steven Schrum, Plaintiff, vs. The Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company, Defendant.
17 18 19 Third Party Plaintiff 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Third Party Defendants. _____________________________ vs. Chemical Lime Company of Arizona, a corporation; ABC Corporations I-IV, fictitious corporations, The Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company, a corporation,
) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )
No. CIV04-619-PHX-RCB O R D E R
Currently pending before the court is a "Motion for In Camera Inspection" by defendant/third-party plaintiff, The Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company ("BNSF") (doc. 145). Having
considered that motion, the objections thereto by third-party
Case 2:04-cv-00619-RCB
Document 149
Filed 03/31/2008
Page 1 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
defendant Chemical Lime Company of Arizona (doc. 146), and BNSF's Reply (doc. 148), the court finds that conducting an in camera review of BNSF's unredacted time itemized statement of attorneys' fees will assist the court in resolving BNSF's Application for Attorneys' Fees and Costs (doc. 132). hereby ORDERS: (1) that BNSF's Motion for In Camera Inspection (doc. 145) is GRANTED: and (2) within ten (10) days from the date of entry of this order, BNSF is directed to file with the Court under seal an unredacted itemized statement of attorneys' fees which it is seeking in connection with this action. DATED this 31st day of March, 2008. Accordingly, the court
Copies to counsel of record
Case 2:04-cv-00619-RCB
-2Document 149 Filed 03/31/2008
Page 2 of 2