Free Motion for Reconsideration - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

F5?§EIP’§.$?$%·¤‘%‘.·t?éI53P£iTE§°§§H“>I;I€1S§3Eii
x ° me is simmer io Rsmcuou sv was cot . I FILED FF- LODGED
...4, museums: _______F2ECE1VED _____COPY
1 Michael Cambra APR 2 5 ZOB?
15934 Hesperian Blvd. P.M.B. 311
2 San Lorenzo, California 94580 Cpggqa 1; 5 mgruqglr GQURT
3 (“°)385‘56°I By.F£TEli’_?iii%%*é%¤a
4
5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
7 ESTATE OF JOSEPH J. STUDNEK, by No. CV-O4-595 PHX MHM
and through its PERSONAL
8 REPRESENTATIVE, JOSEPH M. MOTION FOR
STUDNEK, RECONSIDERATION OF
9 MOTION TO ENFORCE
Plaintiff and SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
10 Counterdefendant AND MOTION TO DISMISS,
PLAINTIFF LACKS
11 v. STANDING TO SUE
12 AMBASSADOR OF GLOBAL MISSIONS
13 UN LIMITED HIS SUCCESSORS, A
CORPORATION SOLE, a Nevada
14 corporation sole; EL SHADDAI
MINISTRIES AND HIS SUCCESSORS, A
15 CORPORATION SOLE, a Nevada
16 corporation; SECOND CHANCE
CHRISTIAN EVANGELISTIC
17 MINISTRIES, a Califomia corporation;
18 BISHOP OF FAITH VISION NOBLE
HOUSE AND HIS SUCCESSORS, A
19 CORPORATION SOLE, a California
corporation; JOSEPH L. WILLIAMS and
20 MONICA C. CISNEROS, as husband and
21 wife; WILLIAM JOE LITTLE, JR.;
MICHAEL CAMBRA and GLORIA
22 CAMBRA, as husband and wife; JOEL p
23 DAVID and CINDY DAVID, as husband
and wife; KEITH AARON VANN and
24 TRISHA VANN, as husband and wife,
25 Defendants and
Counterclaimant.
26
27
28
se 2:04-cv—OO595-I\/IHI\/I Document 205 Filed O4/25/2007 Page 1 of 3

`L I i
I MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF MOTION TO ENFORCE
2 SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF’S
COMPLAINT
3
4 Defendant Michael Cambra ("Cambra"), hereby moves this Court for a
5 Motion for Reconsideration pursuant to Rule 59 (a)(2) & (e) of the Federal Rules of
6 Civil Procedure for Reconsideration of the Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement
7 and to dismiss this action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. l2(b)(1), 12 (b)(2) and 12
8
9 (b)(6); and Relief from Judgment or Order pursuant to Rule 60 (a) and (b). Plaintiff
10 fails to state claims for which relief can be granted and, in any event this Court lacks
11 jurisdiction to hear plaintiffs’ claims. The reasons supporting this motion are set forth
12 in more detail in the accompanying Memorandum of Law and attached exhibits.
13
14 THEREFORE, defendant respectfully requests that the instant motion be
15 GRANTED and that this action be DISMISSED.
16
17 Dated: April 21, 2007.
18
19 ~/n,Q.@é;
20 BY . 7
Michael Cambra
21
1 hereby certify that on April 21, 2007, I mailed the attached document to the Clerk’s
22 Office using the USPS System for filing and transmittal of a Notice Filing to the
23 following registrants:
24
Bradley D. Weech
25 Jeremy S. Geigle
26 Jackson White
40 N. Center Street, Suite 200
27 Mesa, AZ 85201
28 Attorneys for Plaintiff/Counterdefendant
No. CV-04-595 PHX MHM - 2 -
Request for Reconsideration and For Dismissal by Cambra
se 2:04-cv—OO595-I\/IHI\/I Document 205 Filed O4/25/2007 Page 2 of 3

I`. I 7
I bweech@]`acks0nwhite1aw.c0m
2 [email protected] ,
3
4 Michael Cambm
5
6
7
8
9
10
1 1
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
N0. CV-O4-595 PHX MHM - 3 -
Request for Reconsideraticn and For Dismissal by Cambra
C se 2:04-cv—OO595-I\/IHI\/I Document 205 Filed O4/25/2007 Page 3 of 3

Case 2:04-cv-00595-MHM

Document 205

Filed 04/25/2007

Page 1 of 3

Case 2:04-cv-00595-MHM

Document 205

Filed 04/25/2007

Page 2 of 3

Case 2:04-cv-00595-MHM

Document 205

Filed 04/25/2007

Page 3 of 3