Free Mandate of 9th Circuit - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

\:~"” I
if ` i UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
i I FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
A IGNACIO LOPEZ, No. 05-17381
D.C. No. CV-O4-00128-ROS
Plaintiff- Appellant,
JUDGMENT
ARIZONA INDUSTRIAL
COMMISSION,
Defendant,
and
STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE
FUND; et al., _
Defendants — Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona
(Phoenix).
On consideration whereof, it is now here ordered and adjudged by this
p Court, that the appeal in this cause be, and hereby is DISMISSED for lack of
jurisdiction. ·
mica and emma Ol/27/06 Li;} iili
lg · Fei} 3 F ggg
ir , 5
{ t1>¥»¤f_;__ _ __ r
Case 2:04-cv—OO128—ROS Document 31 Filed O2/24/2006 Page 1 of 2

’\ at _ .
(2/)* T D
I UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS -
y JAN 27 ZUG5
FOR THE NINTH IR T ,
C Cm srrsrsaeiatrt
IGNACIO LOPEZ, No. 05-17381
` Plaintiff- Appellant, D.C. No. CV-04-00128-ROS
v. District of Arizona,
Phoenix
STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE
FUND; et al., ·
ORDER
Defendants - Appellees.
Before: T. G. NELSON, SILVERMAN and BYBEE, Circuit Judges
A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction orer
this appeal because the December l2, 2005 notice of appeal was not filed within
60 days from the order entered on September 15, 2005, denying plaintiff s motion
to reopen the case. See 28 U.S.C. § 2107; Alexander v. Sacha, 439 F.2d 742 (9th
Cir. 1971) (requirement of timely notice of appeal is jurisdictional).
Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
‘ A
- $2;:-if E-as JN I
"` e _ [
FEES?-2 1 9 55;} I
_ _ _ l V ‘ I
by _,
S:\PROSE\pane1ords\2006\1 .06\January23\jm]1\05·l738 1 .wpd I
Case 2:04-cv—OO128—ROS Document 31 Filed O2/24/2006 Page 2 of 2

Case 2:04-cv-00128-ROS

Document 31

Filed 02/24/2006

Page 1 of 2

Case 2:04-cv-00128-ROS

Document 31

Filed 02/24/2006

Page 2 of 2