Free Order of 9th Circuit - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS F l L E D
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT SEP 2 0 ms
GA
e.Tt*'e%e°t1'.r*e·~....a·¤=¤·=.,
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 05-10540
Plaintiff- Appellee, D.C. No. CR-04-00820-FJM
District of Arizona, p _
i HARVEY L. SLONIKER, JR., - I
ORDER
Defendant - Appellant.
Before: REINHARDT, RYMER and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges
Appellee’s motion to file late its memorandum in opposition to the motion
for bail pending trial is granted. The opposition has been tiled.
The district court correctly found that the government has met its burden of
showing, by a preponderance ofthe evidence, that appellant constitutes a flight
risk and that, therefore, there is no condition or combination of conditions that will
s ` r is ieeeedee1;Te§eYd·ei£ppei1iedi*§i eppeeieeee as required. see is U.s.c. § 2»142(e);
United States v. Motamedi, 767 F.2d 1403, 1406-07 (9th Cir. 1985).
The district court’s detention order is
AFFIRMFB 7 D 7 T Sli?-1`¥£¤$?€K¥reeeeN
Clerk cf Ccurt
Rsmrranor, cu-edit Judge, presenting: "`“ESTp i r e.
I dissent. [would grant bail. — EP Z U mug? `
s;xMoArn1>eee1eedxoo.osuzxusQ1os4n.v»pd by
D..‘?....‘L§l°i.»‘B5
_ Case 2:O4—cr—OO820-FJIVI Document 154 Filed O9/20/2005 Page 1 of 1

Case 2:04-cr-00820-FJM

Document 154

Filed 09/20/2005

Page 1 of 1