Free Response in Opposition to Motion - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Law Office of

273 S. Scott Avenue Tucson, Arizona 85701 (520) 884-1234 [email protected] AzBar:009144
Attorney for Claimants

RICHARD B. JONES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) (1) $493,850 in U.S. Currency, and ) (2) One 1993 Ford F-350 Truck, ) ) Defendants. ) ******************************** ) Roy Bruno, and ) Miguel Camacho, ) Claimants. ) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CV03-2345 PHX VAM CLAIMANTS' RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED SECOND SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION

The Claimants, through counsel, hereby respond to the Government's Amended Second Motion for Summary Judgment. The current version, which is really the Government's Third Motion for Summary Judgment in this matter, reargues many issues that have already been decided by this court. Those issues the Government seeks to be reconsidered will be identified, and the Claimants, consistent with Local Rule §7.2(g), will not respond to them absent an order to do so by this court. The only new information in the current Motion for Summary Judgment is the information from Miami. Yet even the recent vintage of this information is in doubt in that it first publically appeared in summary form in the Government's November 10, 2004 Response to the Claimant's Motion for Summary Judgment and was known to Arizona
Case 2:03-cv-02345-VAM Document 60 Filed 09/19/2005 Page 1 of 1