Free Response in Support of Motion - District Court of Arizona - Arizona


File Size: 73.2 kB
Pages: 2
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Arizona
Category: District Court of Arizona
Author: unknown
Word Count: 594 Words, 3,637 Characters
Page Size: 622.08 x 792 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/azd/35004/271-3.pdf

Download Response in Support of Motion - District Court of Arizona ( 73.2 kB)


Preview Response in Support of Motion - District Court of Arizona
2 is `
Tami Sc!-iiliing y
From: Chuck Hanan
sent; Tuesday, June 25, EUG1 2:12 PM
To: Tami Schilling
Subject: RE: Etoy
All I needed to Imowr Please proceed,.
-~·—¤i:glnsi l~twoo·-»~·
From: Temi Sdillling `
Sent: Tuesday. 3une ze, zoo: 1:47 PM
To: Chuck Hanan
Subject: Fw: Boy
Does this information suffice forwtset you needed priorto me releasing the job for Etsy Martinez?
—·—~-Original HesSage—-··
From: Ellen M lwtnoree
Bent: Tuesday, June ZG, 2¤El1 1:42 Pi-? "
Yo: Tami Schilling A
Subject: FW: Eloy
· Tnis is the eoourate infomation for Eioy. ··
"······UdQl|’lBl a-cv:. QE·"‘“
From: Word bannostv
sont: Tuesday, Anrii Z4, Zittil 11:46 AM
Tn: Rod Hott; Ellen M D'Andn2o
subject: RE: Eloy
Spoke wiih Dove Gonzales and Mike Darmewilz yesierdayr
Since Etsy will be a UES emoioyee administered es e FA5 ‘
his ioonos payment wil! be a Net $20,000 if the ment
rating is commendable or higher. when the promotion io
an AFE Lakes place the Net $20,000 should l¤sEprorated and a
prorated Leadership Bonus will start on his AF appointment date. -
--·-0rl9ine| Message-—-— ·
From: Rod Huff
Sent: wednmday, Aorli 18, 2001 MI5 PM
·r¤: euen r-: ovmdres
co: Ward Lancaster
Subject: RE: Boy
Eiien, lrhinktnat is entirely dependent on whatyour region wents to do in his case, end any `
agreement reached with corporate Agency. i do not know what he has been told or promised, nor
what hes been discussed with the Corporate Agency area that tracks the AFC) Leadership Bonuses.
i’ii ask Ward to respond as weil if he has a perspective.
Since E1oy's sltuetion is compieteiy outside ofthe norm enywey, lt wouiu appear thei you can do
wherever you deem necessary.
—-Original Message--—
Fmm: Binh M D'Ahdl"&&
sont: Wednesday, April 18, ZBD1 10:32 AM
To: Rod Hel'?
subject: FW: Eloy
Good morning. Rod. Now that exec is back. we have one more question. if we administer Elo‘y at an
FA5 while doing tho FAQ job, is he eiigiose for the FAS or FAB bonus'? ltoauses an issue if he e
eligible for the A5 bonus because that ls based on job duties of an AFE.
Coil me if i've confused youii 480-293-8514. I
-··-·¤¤-iglns: !·iessoge—~——- _ I
1
SEM KILLIJDGDGZBZQ
Produced Pursuant; 1:.0 Ermtectzive Order
in Kilmingswmzrh , John v. sswrrc
_ // I J
Case 2.03-cv-01950-NVW g!l@A$\»·7·§AeHU§9/O7&>O5 Page 1 of 2

2 ·. M A
From: Ellen M D'Audraa
sent:. Friday, Apiié D6, ztwr. 3:91 PM i
Tc: ‘ Mika Dannewitz ·
Cc: Lara Murphy; Ellen M ¤'Andrea
Suhrieutz RE: Etcv
Mika, this is Camurate Gompensaticmk reccmmandaégn fur Etoy. Ttw FAS is the salary
administration puriiun cnty since his current saimgs wrthtrr that range. Since the only jah we have at
an FAS lava! is AF E, and that is nat aur intent for tay, we are creating 2 rob title fur him while in the
AFC rule. Es this acceptabis?
—·—--»Oti9inai Meswwe
Frans: Rnd Hart
Sant: Frtday,ApriI U5, 2DUl 10:43At·1
Ta: EIIGH M Dvtttcirea
subiect: EIGY
Egg agcrgt Mgeney ManagementAaaiata1¤Y' as at UEE amptayaa administered es an FAS white in the
ru a.
i
2 r
SEM KILLIJUGUUZQBD
Produced Puxsuamt: tc: P2:c>*cact.ive Under
in Ki.1 1 ingswcxth , John v. s ramwirz
Case 2:03-cv-01950-NVW Document 271 -3 Filed O9/O7/2005 Page 2 of 2

Case 2:03-cv-01950-NVW

Document 271-3

Filed 09/07/2005

Page 1 of 2

Case 2:03-cv-01950-NVW

Document 271-3

Filed 09/07/2005

Page 2 of 2