Free Jury Verdict - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

curio ____ toooao
1 ip; aecawtao _____ COPY
2 e@ mac 0 2 zuus
3 ctem-< u e Dist R10? COURT
ossrmcsr OF Amzom
4 BY DEPUTY
5
6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9 Craig Tucker, ) No. CV-O3-1425-PHX—DGC
10 Plaintiff, g
11 vs. i VERDICT FORM
12
, 13 City of Tempe,
Defendant.
14
)
15
16 The jury must unanimously agree on the answers to the following questions:
17 Americans with Disabilities Act Claim
18 1. Has Plaintiff proven by a preponderance of the evidence that he had a
"disability" under the Americans with Disabilities Act as defined in the
19 Cou1t’s instructions?
20 YES [ NO
i21 If your answer is "NO" then lyou need not answer the remaining questions
22 concerning the Americans wit Disabilities Act claim.
2. Has Plaintiff proven by a {preponderance of the evidence that he was a
23 "qualified individual" as de med in the Court’s instructions?
24 YES K NO
25 If your answer is "NO" then Hou need not answer the remaining questions
26 concerning the Americans wit Disabilities Act claim.
3. Has Plaintiff proven by a preponderance ofthe evidence that he was terminated
27 by Defendant?
28 YES [ NO
ase 2:O3—cv—O1425-DGC Document 55 Filed 12/O2/2005 Page 1 of 4

1 If your answer is "NO" then ou need not answer the remaining questions
concerning the Americans with Disabilities Act claim.
2 4. Has Plaintiff proven by a preponderance ofthe evidence that his disability was
3 a substantial or motivating factor that prompted Defendant to take that action?
4 YES JL NO __
5 If your answer is "NO" then ou need not answer the remaining questions
6 conceming the Americans with Disabilities Act claim.
5. Has Plaintiff proven by a preponderance of the evidence that he should be
7 ?1‘3£2d2‘§‘$2"&2fa?€E§’ §1°{11§‘i5‘§3E»€°fni$12l?3§§$ Wagcs and b€“““S md °“‘“
8 S
9 YES g NO __
10 If your answer is "YES," in what amount'? $ 6
12
13
14
15
l 16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 _ 2 _
ase 2:O3—cv—O1425-DGC Document 55 Filed 12/O2/2005 Page 2 of 4

1 Free Speech Claim
2 1. Has Plaintiff proven by a preponderance of the evidence that Defendant
retaliated against him for exercising his right to free speech as defined by the {
3 Court’s instructions?
4 YES ;_ NO JL
5 2. If you answered "YESf’ to the preceding question, state the amount of
6 compensatory damages, if any, Plarntrff should be awarded agamst Defendant.
AMOUNT $
7
8
9
10
11
12
p 13
4 14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 _ 3 _
ase 2:O3—cv—O1425-DGC Document 55 Filed 12/O2/2005 Page 3 of 4

1 Due Process Claim
2 1. Has Plaintiff proven by a preponderance _of the evidence that_Defendant
3 v1o1ated hrs rrght to due process as defined 1n the Cou1t’s rnstructrons?
YES; NO J;
2 2. If you answered "YES?’ to the preceding qluestion, state the amount of
compensatory damages, 1f any, Plamtrff should e awarded aga1nst Defendant.
6 AMOUNT EB
7
8 Dated: '9 'O5-
9 .
10 % 2
ll ury oreperson um er
12
13
d 14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26 8
27
28 _ 4 _
ase 2:O3—cv—O1425-DGC Document 55 Filed 12/O2/2005 Page 4 of 4

Case 2:03-cv-01425-DGC

Document 55

Filed 12/02/2005

Page 1 of 4

Case 2:03-cv-01425-DGC

Document 55

Filed 12/02/2005

Page 2 of 4

Case 2:03-cv-01425-DGC

Document 55

Filed 12/02/2005

Page 3 of 4

Case 2:03-cv-01425-DGC

Document 55

Filed 12/02/2005

Page 4 of 4