Free Supplement - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

I A THE MARK LAW FIRM
p 14210 West Piccadilly
2 Goodyear, Arizona 85338
3 1 Telep one: (623) 210-4600
Eric A. Mark, 014839
4 Attomeys for Defendant Hartford Casualty Insurance Company
5
6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7 1 IN AND FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8 1 SG NEW YORK LLC, a Delaware limited CV 2003-1207 PHX SMM
liability company, and the successor-in-
9 interest to Pennysaver News of DEFENDANT’S SUPPLEMENTAL
Brookhaven, Inc., and Carrier Pigeon of DESIGNATION OF DEPOSITION
10 Long Island, LLC, TESTIMONY FOR TRIAL
U p Plaintiff,
12 1 vs.
_ 13 HARTFORD CASUALTY -
1 INSURANCE COMPANY, an Indiana
14 corporation,
15 A Defendant.
16 Defendant, Hartford Casualty Insurance Company ("Hartford"), by and through its
17 counsel undersigned, submits its designations of testimony from the deposition of
18 Richard Megenedy, Plaintiffs former publisher and general manager. Hartford only
19 1 learned as of Friday, July 22, that Plaintiff had reversed its decision to call Mr. Megenedy
20 as a live witness at trial. Accordingly, the parties stipulated that Hartford could tile its `
21 1 supplemental designations from Mr. Megenedy’s deposition, as follows:
22 i Page 6, line 10 through page 6, line 12
23 Page 10, line 11 through page 10, line 22
24 Page 11, line 13 through page 12, line 2
25 Page 14, line 6 through page 16, line 25
26 1 Page 15, line 11 through page 15, line 25
Case 2:03-cv-01207-SIVIIVI Document 77 Filed 08/O2/2005 Page 1 of 4 1

. 1
I Page 23, line 22 (beginning with "Rich") through page 24, line 4 (ending with
2 "Yes.")
3 Page 24, line 18 through page 25, line 5
4 Page 25, line 12 through page 25, line 17
5 Page 26, line 5 through page 26, line 12
6 Page 29, line 20 through page 29, line 24
7 Page 30, line 1 through page 30, line 10
8 Page 31, line 4 through page 31, line 11 i
9 Page 34, line 6 through page 36, line 14 I
10 Page 38, line 2 through page 38, line 17
E 11 Page 40, line 9 through page 40, line 20
E E 12 Page 41, line 21 through page 42, line 3
E E ig é 13 Page 46, line 21 through page 47, line 9
E § gi 14 Page 54, line 11 through page 55, line 1
15 Page 58, line 8 through page 59, line 7
16 Page 59, line 11 through page 59, line 20
17 Page 60, line 23 through page 62, line 13
18 Page 62, line 23 through page 63, line 11
19 Page 64, line 17 through page 64, line 23
20 Page 79, line 16 through page 80, line 1
21 Page 80, line 15 through page 81, line 10 l
22 Page 82, line 17 through page 82, line 21
23 Page 94, line 8 through page 95, line 25
24 Page 97, line 7 through page 97, line 12
25 Page 97, line 20 through page 99, line 9
26 Page 100, line 1 through page 101, line 24
2
Case 2:03-cv-01207-SIVIIVI Document 77 Filed 08/O2/2005 Page 2 of 4

1 Page 104, line 17 through page 105, line 22
2 Page 106, line 3 through page 106, line 10
3 Page 107, line 4 through page 108, line 1
4 Page 109, line 16 through page 109, line 22
5 Page 112, line 6 through page 113, line 16
6 Page 116, line 21 through page 117, line 14
7 Page 118, line 8 through page 119, line 3
8 Page 120, line 17 through page 121, line 7 1
_ 9 Page 122, line 11 through page 124, line 8
10 Page 126, line 12 through page 127, line 9
E 11 Page 128, line 1 through page 131, line 13
E 12 Page 132, line 3 through page 132, line 23
E Q3 lg g 13 Page 134, line 9 through page 135, line 6
E § ig 14 DEFENDANT’S OBJECTION S TO PLAINTIFF’S DESIGNATIONS OF MR.
15
16 1. Page 69, line 16 through page 72, line 10 — Hearsay; this portion of Mr.
17 Megenedy’s deposition testimony describes discussions he shared with another witness in
18 the case, James McQuillan of Shamrock Restoration, and Plaintiff’ s former infomation
19 technologies manager, Frank Flanagan. The out-of-court declarations from Mr, 1
20 McQuillan and Mr. Flanagan constitute inadmissible hearsay, as they are offered for the
21 truth of the matter asserted (i.e., that Plaintiff’s tlood loss would cause damage to
22 Plaintiff’ s electrical equipment), and the statements do not tit within any hearsay
23 exception.
24 . . .
25 . . .
26 . . .
3
Case 2:03-cv-01207-SIVIIVI _ Document 77 Filed 08/O2/2005 Page 3 of 4

QT"
1 RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this / " day of August, 2005.
2 THE MARK LAW FIRM
3 V F
4
Eric A. Mark
5 Attomeys for De ndantHa1tford
6 Casualty Compa y
7 .
8 Origin and one copy of the foregoing filed
9 this L-Sgday of August, 2005 . ‘
COPY of the foregoing mailed this [ ut day
10 ofAugust, 2005, to:
E U John Clemency, Esq;
°§ § g g Tajudeen Ola iran, sq.
j E _§ g 12 GREENBERG TRAURIG, LLP
g E { Q 2375 East Camelback Road, Suite 700
EE s s 13 1=·h¤e¤1x,Az 85016
Q 5 ag Attomeys for Plaintiff SG New York, LLC
e· — 8 I
15
#7/L
16 F:\E:ic\SG \T \DwoDcsigSupp.duc
17
18 E
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
4
Case 2:03-cv-01207-SIVIIVI Document 77 Filed 08/O2/2005 Page 4 of 4

Case 2:03-cv-01207-SMM

Document 77

Filed 08/02/2005

Page 1 of 4

Case 2:03-cv-01207-SMM

Document 77

Filed 08/02/2005

Page 2 of 4

Case 2:03-cv-01207-SMM

Document 77

Filed 08/02/2005

Page 3 of 4

Case 2:03-cv-01207-SMM

Document 77

Filed 08/02/2005

Page 4 of 4