Free Motion for Leave to File - District Court of Arizona - Arizona


File Size: 36.7 kB
Pages: 2
Date: February 10, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: Arizona
Category: District Court of Arizona
Author: unknown
Word Count: 446 Words, 2,781 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/azd/34060/144-1.pdf

Download Motion for Leave to File - District Court of Arizona ( 36.7 kB)


Preview Motion for Leave to File - District Court of Arizona
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24

BEUS GILBERT PLLC
ATTORNEYS AT LAW

4800 NORTH SCOTTSDALE ROAD SUITE 6000 SCOTTSDALE, ARIZONA 85251 TELEPHONE (480) 429-3000

Leo R. Beus/ [email protected]/002687 Richard H. Herold/ [email protected] /018396 Linnette R. Flanigan/ [email protected]/019771 Attorneys for Defendants UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA BROWN & BAIN, P.A., an Arizona professional association, Plaintiff, vs. JOHN M. O'QUINN, an individual, JOHN M. O'QUINN & ASSOCIATES L.L.P., a Texas limited liability partnership; JOHN M. O'QUINN, P.C. a Texas professional corporation; JOHN M. O'QUINN LAW FIRM, PLLC, a Texas limited liability company; O'QUINN, KERENSKY & McANINCH; and JANE DOE O'QUINN, Defendants. JOHN M. O'QUINN, an individual, JOHN M. O'QUINN & ASSOCIATES L.L.P., a Texas limited liability partnership; JOHN M. O'QUINN, P.C. a Texas professional corporation; JOHN M. O'QUINN LAW FIRM, PLLC, a Texas limited liability company; O'QUINN, KERENSKY & McANINCH. Counterclaimants, vs. BROWN & BAIN, P.A., an Arizona professional association, Counterdefendants.
Case No. CIV-03-0923-PHX-ROS

MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE SURREPLY

25
H:\10266\Brown & Bain v. O'Quinn\Pleadings\District Court\Mtn for Leave to File Surreply.doc

Case 2:03-cv-00923-ROS

Document 144

Filed 02/10/2006

Page 1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6

Plaintiff Brown & Bain requests in its Reply Brief in support of its most recent Motion for Partial Summary Judgment that the Affidavit of Carl Shaw be stricken. Defendant O'Quinn respectfully requests that the Court consider the attached Surreply in light of the importance of the issues raised by the Shaw Affidavit, its relevant and probative value in considering the parties' intent under the fee agreement in dispute, and for all the reasons set forth in the attached Surreply.

7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 The Honorable Roslyn O. Silver United States District Court 401 West Washington Phoenix, AZ 85003 Copy sent via e-mail and U.S. Mail this 10th day of February 2006 to: Peter D. Baird Richard A. Halloran Cory A. Talbot LEWIS AND ROCA LLP 40 North Central Avenue Phoenix, Arizona 85004-4429 Attorneys for Plaintiff Brown & Bain, P.A. s / Linnette R. Flanigan
H:\10266\Brown & Bain v. O'Quinn\Pleadings\District Court\Mtn for Leave to File Surreply.doc

DATED this 10th day of February 2006. BEUS GILBERT PLLC By s / Linnette R. Flanigan Leo R. Beus Richard H. Herold Linnette R. Flanigan 4800 North Scottsdale Road Suite 6000 Scottsdale, AZ 85251 Attorneys for Defendants

Original filed via ECF with the Clerk of the Court and via hand-delivery this 10th day of February 2006 to:

Case 2:03-cv-00923-ROS

Document 144

2 Filed 02/10/2006

Page 2 of 2