Free Additional Attachments to Main Document - District Court of Arizona - Arizona

Fr0mZUS PTS & PROBt!\TlUN FLAGSURFF 92817-420Bii U4/U3/ZUU6 USYSU #lUl P.UUl/UU-3
r:g5§?F.;
Patricia A. Bingham, Chief , 44+¢7 ;-ee; 260 U.S. Courthouse
U.S. PF€l`Vi0l Services O]1°Y€€F E _, ,F°\, ii 401 West Washington Street, SPC 8
ii Q, ~ _ ;} Ji Ptwenix, Arizona 85003-2119
‘·t 1 -— 1 (602) 322-7350
`$% a¢?$Y” (602) 322- 7380 FAX
wiz
Reply to: Flagstajf
United States District Court • U.S. Pretrial Services • District of Arizona
PLEASE DELIVER TO:
Tm Mk/Nt 7 CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
,9\ rk _ This fax may contain confidential
information protected by Title 18 USC
FROM_ § 3153(c) (1) and Pretrial
` Confidentiality Regulations. U you are
Sum}, R_ Cieluch NOT the intended recipient, be advised
(928) '/74_2]-O9 BXL 32 that any disclosure or copying of this
Fax (928) 7744064 information is prohibited. U you have
received this fax in error, please call
(602) 322-7350 immediately for
Date: Qi OZZIOKO
Time:
Total number of pages (including cover sheet): 6
COMMENTS:
405 West Congress Street, Suite 2600 123 North San Francisco, Room 202 I 940 South 3"’Avenue., Suite B
Tucson, Arizona 85701-5020 Flagstaff Arizona 86001 Yuma, Arizona 85364
(520} 205-4350 (928) 774-2109 (928) 783-1239
(520) 205-4399 FAX (928) 77¢2064 FAX (928) 7.25-5s51 FAX
Visi: our website at www.azd.uscourts.gov
Case 2:O3—cr—O1269-NVW Document 256-2 Filed O4/O5/2006 Page 1 of 3


fr0mZU$ PTS & PRUBAIION FLIRGSI RFP SZBYMZUBA 0A/0%/2000 0%:BI llllll l°.UU'Z/Ul]?
h 03/28/2006 1s:s4 FAX 2141132469 it s PRETRIAL 002
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
T PROBATIGN AND PRETRIAL SERVICES
I NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS
coupon it oxaoa l noo gggrmgjca
cmrr I ri 1
JOLENER WRITTEN * Much 24’ 2006 DALms,raxAs rszaznssi
oarorv carer (214) 753-2450
mznv it rurcaut
DEPUTY CHIEF
Sunny R. Cieluch
U-S. Prctrial Services
Flagstaff, AZ
RE: Bryan, Paul K.
Dkt. No. CR-I-1269-PHX-NVW
Courtesy Pretrial Supervision Case
Dear Ms. Cieluch:
The defendant and his legal counsel have contacted my office to request additional
information regarding his supervision status and regarding his prior move from Missouri
to Texas and prior proposed move from Texas to Florida.
First, the defendant initially reported in person to the Dallas office on October 6, 2005 to
initiate courtesy supervision. Since that date, he has fully complied with reporting
instructions and I have no direct knowledge of any violations of pretrial release. My
contact with the defendant has found him to be lucid and reasonable and he has reported
the need to maintain his medication regimen to remain mentally stable.
On October 11, 2005, the defendant’s wife reported the defendant was admitted on
October 10 into the VA Medical Center Hospital. The wife advised the defendant was not
acting rationally and stated her belief the defendant was not stable on his current
medication and was admitted to a psychiatric unit at the medical center. On October ll.
2005, I notified your office of this hospitalization and advised I would advise you further
as infonnation became available to my office. Due to general difliculty in obtaining
medical records from the VA Medical Center, I did not seek any documentation regarding
the hospitalization-
Second, on November 4, 2005, I inet with the defendant and his wife at their residence. His '
wife infonned me that her temporary job assignment inDallas has expired in October 2005
and she would be seeking employment inlilorida. The defendant and their daughter would
remain in Texas until the wife could establish a residence for herself and then the
defendant and the daughter. I told the defendant and his wife that if they proposed at
Case 2:03-cr—O1269-NVW Document 256-2 Filed O4/O5/2006 Page 2 of 3


FromZUS PTS 3< PRUBM lUN FLAGSTQFF 928Yl`él2OB!l Oil/@3/2006 Ugigi iiim P-003/003
W 03/28/2008 15:54 FAX 2141522469 U s PRETRIAL *’°J
{ RB: Bryan, Paul K.
Page 2
relocation plan. I woulci notify your office to seek 1'inal approval of such a move. I did not
advise approval of the lan myself, but that I would communicate the proposed plan to
Arizona. The emphasis ofthe defendant and his wife in proposing a move to Florida in the
future was in planning for the defendant to have to serve a custody sentence. They felt the
Wife and daughter would have family resources available to them in Florida during his
absence.
On November 14, 2005, I communicated to you of the defendant and his wife's plan to
relocate to Davie, Florida, if approved, on November 28, 2005. On the same date, you
responded that the defendant could not relocate without permission ofthe Court and his
legal counsel would have to tile a motion requesting such a relocation. Alter the Court
denied the relocation plan, the defendant and his wife were unhappy with the decision, but
the defendant advised he would abide by the Court's ruling and remain in Dallas.
The defendant and his wife were surprised by the negative response to the proposed move
to Florida and by how the prior relocation from Missouri to Texas was viewed, The
defendant and his wife apparently had no knowledge that the move to Texas was
unapproved because the relocation was reported to the supervising officer in Missouri and
subsequently to your office prior to the move to Texas. At the time you requested courtesy
supervision by the Dallas office, I was not made aware of the move to Texas as being
unapproved or as being seen in a negative light.
Please provide a copy of this letter to defendant’s coruisel pursuant to their request.
'ncer ly,
e~R. asquez
I U.S. Probation
Case 2:03-cr—O1269-NVW Document 256-2 Filed O4/O5/2006 Page 3 of 3

Case 2:03-cr-01269-NVW

Document 256-2

Filed 04/05/2006

Page 1 of 3

Case 2:03-cr-01269-NVW

Document 256-2

Filed 04/05/2006

Page 2 of 3

Case 2:03-cr-01269-NVW

Document 256-2

Filed 04/05/2006

Page 3 of 3