Free Motion for Order to Show Cause - District Court of Arizona - Arizona


File Size: 64.8 kB
Pages: 3
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Arizona
Category: District Court of Arizona
Author: unknown
Word Count: 513 Words, 3,208 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/azd/23610/102-9.pdf

Download Motion for Order to Show Cause - District Court of Arizona ( 64.8 kB)


Preview Motion for Order to Show Cause - District Court of Arizona
Exhibit 8
i
E
E
I
1
Case 2:O2—cv—O1815-JAT Document 102-9 Filed O1/18/2007 Page1 of 3 /

usr 4:.: Luuo 1.¤:¤ r ¤u¢*:3¤:>*‘3a _ l.\.rY ANU Ab¤UU.l.P‘·`T W-Wi UZ '
n LOFY&ASSOClA'H£S. PCC. ·
LAWOPFICKS i
lll20 Norm! TATUM Bounavman, SUYFB 101 THLBMIONB: (602) 995-7400 -
Pttosnlx, ARIZONA 85028 FA¢:suMu..n: (602) 996-5333 g
March 21, 2006 Via Fax: 301.566.0750
and U.S. First Class Mm'!
Peter M. de Jonge .
Thorpe North and Western
P.O. Box 1219 _
Sandy, Utah 8409l-1219 A ‘
Re: Rozzi Sports do Courts
» Your Docket Nos.: 24549 and 24109
Dear Mr. de Jouge: _
Regarding your March 6 letter regarding Rozzi Sports&Courtsa¤d otherissues,R11i¤o appreciates A
your efforts to scour the Internet to find uses of "eport" and "cou1·t" together. It is not Rhino’s
intention to violate the permanent injunction, and we do not believe that Rhino has done so.
The lceyaceesscom website that you have attached is very old copy. Frankly. Rhino was not even
aware this was on thc web. Tlmuk you for locating it; Rhino is working to promptly change the
language on the site. U
Also, on the "Rhino Sports Franchise" sponsored links you cite, Rhino has requested from its
advertising agency the removal ofthe terms ”Sport(s)" and ”Ceurt" used together. Again, we are
pleased to be informed of this, because occasionally new copywriters working for Rhino’s
advertising agencies make the understandable mistake ofusing the generic term "spozt(s) court". I
Regarding Tom Rozzi, Rhino has sent him a Tab 6 letter even though he is not a Rhino dealer.
Rhino has also sent a Tab 6 letterto its dealer in thc area whom it spolce to in_`February eboutyour ‘
allegations. lt is my zmderstanding that the changes to the meta tags on the website referred to are
_ being made and that the advertising will be changed upon republication. Nonetheless, please see the
attached correspondence.
Regarding your alleged mark COURT BUILDER, we do not find your claims persuasive at all.
"C¤¤}‘l Builder" is a descriptive phrase for what our website does ·- allow the prospective customer
to build a court in cyberspace. Regardless, Rhine has already branded most ofthls feature as
1
1
Case 2:02-cv—01815—JAT Document 102-9 Filed 01/18/2007 Page 2 of 3

ua: eu awa xo: ur DUZSBDO-*33 LIT'! AND AS9I3I•¤"T PAGE B3
Peter M. de Jongc n
March 21, 2006
Page 2 _
"Cmte—A—C¤m1" on the Rhino websim, an/dbastakcnthis ujaponunitytocomplctcthoproocssmnd Q
remove all references to "Court Builder" from the site in an effort bo strengthen its branding. _
Vw my y¤¤r¤.
ilGy
JCW/mas
Wf|*•! m\IMu¤n1;·|¤¤yqnqgp;• ggmgc - Z
5
· 1
~ i
1 1
1
Case 2:02-cv—01815—JAT Document 102-9 Filed 01/18/2007 Page 3 013 —

Case 2:02-cv-01815-JAT

Document 102-9

Filed 01/18/2007

Page 1 of 3

Case 2:02-cv-01815-JAT

Document 102-9

Filed 01/18/2007

Page 2 of 3

Case 2:02-cv-01815-JAT

Document 102-9

Filed 01/18/2007

Page 3 of 3