Free Notice of Appeal - District Court of Arizona - Arizona


File Size: 49.8 kB
Pages: 2
Date: November 20, 2006
File Format: PDF
State: Arizona
Category: District Court of Arizona
Author: unknown
Word Count: 401 Words, 2,738 Characters
Page Size: 622.08 x 792 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/azd/22502/635.pdf

Download Notice of Appeal - District Court of Arizona ( 49.8 kB)


Preview Notice of Appeal - District Court of Arizona
Q rmsnocumeurt-|AsggBEENSUBMl17E¤ p•LE¤"“"‘*"rr*·~ ···· L-ODGE .
ELECTRONICALLY AS REQUIRED BY THE `"` H EC —“— D
J numucr or unmrws mumnsmmve ——— E"·’E¤ .....¤¤PY
IOUCIEQ ARD PROCEDURES IAIIUAI.
NUV 1 6 2006
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COU ‘ T
Fon THE nrsrmcrr on Anrzotvn ¤L%j§T¤|g“ip§;2sg|·;g¤unT
NA
PHOENIX DIVISION gy*h_—_—-——-——P DEPUTY
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE *
COMMISSION, * CASE NO.
* CV-02-0581 PHX (EHC)
Plaintiff, *
=•¤
vs. *
* NOTICE OF APPEAL
U.S. RESERVATION BANK & TRUST; *
HIGHER INVESTMENT TECHNOLOGIES, *
INC.; GLOBAL-LINK CAPITAL MARKETS, *
LTD.; EDWARD J. DRIVING HAWK, SR.; *
LEO R. DRIVING HAWK, SR.; JOHN M. *
ADAMS; KENNETH S. HARRISON; *
WILLIAM J. HERISKO *
AND THOMAS T. EMERTON, III; *
e
Defendants, *
si
OYATE DEVELOPMENT, INC.; ET AL. *
=:=
Equitable Relief *
Defendants. *
a
NOTICE is hereby given that, Global-Link Capital Markets Ltd, LLC, William J.
Herisko, and Thomas T. Emeiton, III, Defendants in the above entitled case, by their attorney,
Ronald J. I-lerisko, pursuant to FRAP Rule 4(a)(1)(B), hereby appeal to the United States Court
of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, from an Order of Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and
Order [Dkt. 509] entered in this action on June 20, 2005; and, from an Order [Dkt. 111] entered
Nov. 5, 2002, denying Det`endants’ Motion to Dismiss, [Dlct. 44].
This appeal is taken from the interim Consent Judgments entered in this action against
William J. I-Ierisko on September 26, 2006 [Dkt. 621]; and, against Thomas T. Emerton, Ill on
Case 2:02-cv-00581-EHC Document 635 Filed 11/16/2006 Page 1 of 2

November 6, 2006 [Dkt. 634] in which Consent Judgments the parties expressly preserved their
right to appeal the matters herein appealed, (See Slctven v. American Trading Trcmsp. C0., Inc.,
146 F.3d 1066, 1070 (9th cir 1998) holding that a party may preserve its right of appeal in a
consent judgment.
Respectfully submitted,
By
onald J. H ris 0, Attorney at Law
Massachusetts BBO No. 231400
Colorado Attorney Registration No. 26467
Admitted Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
P.O. Box 2830
Palm Springs, California 92263
AC 760 - Tel. 323-9315; Fax 323-9215; Cell 408-7897
Email address: [email protected]
Attorney for Global-Link Capital Markets Ltd., LLC,
William J. Herisko, and Thomas T. Emerton, HI
Case 2:02-cv-00581-EHC Document 635 Filed 11/16/2006 Page 2 of 2

Case 2:02-cv-00581-EHC

Document 635

Filed 11/16/2006

Page 1 of 2

Case 2:02-cv-00581-EHC

Document 635

Filed 11/16/2006

Page 2 of 2