(Rev.12f04) ._ ._ _ FILED ......
W "'J E Racstvso ______ corv
UNITED STATES DISTRICT CO RT APR 1 2 mg
for
DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Cl—%‘$§TLéIg}'E’g*;’2§&gggRT
gv béfit-lfr
United States v. Linda Sue FLORES Docket No. 02CR01 153-001-PHX-ROS
Petition to Revoke Probation ....- - ·. r ·
1 » SEALED
COMES NOW PROBATION OFFICER Adelina Bustamante presenting an official report on Linda
Sue FLORES who was placed on probation on February 24, 2003, by the Honorable Rosiyn O. Silver
presiding in the District Court of Arizona. Afive year period of probation was imposed. In addition to the
general terms and conditions adopted bythe court in General Order 05-36, the offender was ordered to
comply with the following special conditions:
1. You shall provide the probation officer access to any requested financial information.
2. You are prohibited from making major purchases, incurring new financial obligations, or entering
into any financial contracts without the prior approval of the probation officer.
3. You shall participate in a mental health program as directed by the probation officer which may
include taking prescribed medication. You shall contribute to the cost of treatment in an amount
to be determined by the probation officer.
4. You shall notify your employer within 60 days of today of your conviction.
Linda Sue FLORES was convicted of Theft of Government Property, a Class C Felony Offense, in
violation of 18 USC §641.
RESPECTFULLY PRESENTING PETITION FOR ACTION OF COURT FOR CAUSE
AS FOLLOWS:
A. Violation of Standard Condition #3: "You shall report to the Probation Office as directed by the
Court or probation officer, and shall submit a truthful and complete written report within the first
tive days of each month."
Flores submitted monthly report forms for the months of November and December 2005, noting she
worked at HoneyBaked Hams. Flores was not truthful about this. According to a supervisor, their work
is seasonal, and during the month of November 20B§i—'?li’·ibIfe€{ivtarIJe*
Flores did not work there during the month of December, véglation.
I >1ii~r.;lt3l·id _ _
33li'~z—i3i3 €iTr‘l··iStltil·l S fi
L33rtiE33H
Case 2:O2—cr—O1153-ROS Document 14 Filed O4/12/2006 Page 1 of 3
Page 2 l
U.S.A. v. Linda Sue FLORES Ni ‘—~...#
Docket No. 02CR01153-001—PHX—ROS
March 20, 2006 _
B. Violation of Standard Condition #3: "You shall report to the Probation Office as directed by
the Court or probation officer, and shall submit a truthful and complete written report within the
first five days of each month."
On November 1, 2005, Flores was directed to report to the Probation Officer the first Tuesday of every
month between 9:00am and 3:00pm. Flores failed to report on January 3, 2006, and February 7,2006.
Grade C violation.
C. Violation of Special Condition #3: "You shall participate in a mental health program as directed
by the probation officer which may include taking prescribed medication. You shall contribute
to the cost of treatment in an amount to be determined by the probation officer."
On January 29, 2006, NOVA discharged Flores from their program due to her noncompliance. Flores
failed to attend the mood management sessions. Grade C violation.
D. On February 24, 2003, the Court ordered Restitution be paid in the amount of $14,228.00, at
the rate of $100 per month. The amount may be adjusted according to the defendant's
circumstances as determined by the probation office.
On May 11, 2004, Flores was directed to pay no less than $100 per month and provide verification of
payments. lf working part-time or working sporadically, Flores was to pay $50 per month and provide
verification. During the year 2005, Flores made two payments toward restitution, totaling $90. Grade
C violation. -
Case 2:O2—cr—O1153-ROS Document 14 Filed O4/12/2006 Page 2 of 3
Page 3 l
U.S.A. v. Linda Sue FLORES iw
Docket No. 02CR01153-001-PHX-ROS
March 20, 2006 -
I AFFIDAVIT AND PETITION PRAYING THAT THE COURT WILL ORDER A SUMMONS BE
ISSUED
in conformance with the provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1746, I declare, under penalty of perjury, that the
foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Based on the information presented that the
offender has violated conditions of supervision, I am petitioning the Court to issue a summons.
1;;.- jr AME sofas/0 sdé
elina Bustamante, Date
enior U.S. Probation Officer
Reviewed by
gl Miki! QMQEIQUQ 3—.,JD»O
L` uri Trigilio Date
Supervisory U.S. Probation Officer
Re 'ewed by .
cg, .3»-a77—c9@
J hn W b Date
Assistant U.S. Attorney
ORDER OF COURT
I find there is probable cause to believe the offender has violated conditions of supervision, supported
by the above affirmation given under penalty of p jury. The Court orders the issuance of a summons.
Considered and ordered this ( Q4; day of ( gg.; S Q , 20 fig'; and ordered tiled and
.. • - - art of the records in the above case.
O "
__l,Lt - 4; . l
The Ho = - · - Roslyn • ilver, -
U.S. District Judge _
Defense Counsel: I
Gerald (AFPD) Williams l
_ 850 West Adams Street _ ‘
Suite 201
Phoenix, Arizona 85007
Case 2:O2—cr—O1153-ROS Document 14 Filed O4/12/2006 Page 3 of 3
Case 2:02-cr-01153-ROS
Document 14
Filed 04/12/2006
Page 1 of 3
Case 2:02-cr-01153-ROS
Document 14
Filed 04/12/2006
Page 2 of 3
Case 2:02-cr-01153-ROS
Document 14
Filed 04/12/2006
Page 3 of 3
United States Free Forms
Canada Free Forms
United Kingdom Free Forms
Australia Free Forms