Free Case Transferred Out to Another District - District Court of Delaware - Delaware

Case 1 :08-cv-00010-JJF Document 8 `Filecl 01/14/2008 Page 1 of 2
JHDIGIAI. PANEL OH
MU!. DISTRICT LITIGATION
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL -
on DEC " 6 M?
MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATIDN um -
. p ¤·LEI=IE’S OFFICE
IN RE: INTEL CORP. MICROPROCESSOR ANTITRUST
LITIGATION T COURT
UNITED STATES DIS I
ALBUOUEFIQUL, NEW MEXICO
Cari Cunningham v. Intel Corp., _ ) ` . _
I rn. Maine, c.A. Na. 2:07-za? ) I JAN 'I 4 ZBUB . _ t
··~··=-...,.—.s¤.s.-· ' , _ ` Gurpw;.-M-. — .— --·. ·-.,.s . rt.·-.-·—··-— -4--W - --7- -- - - -- =··—· -
` D. New Mexico, C.A. No. 1:07-1186 )
E E MATTHEW J. DYKNIAN
LEFIK
CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO? G .
On November 8, 2005, the Panel transferred ten civil actions to the Unit d States District Court for
the District of Delaware for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1407. See 403 F.Supp.2d 1356 (J.P.M.L. 2005). Since that time, 22 additional actions have been
transferred to the District of Delaware. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been
assigned to the Honorable Joseph J. Farnan, Jr.
lt appears that the actions on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are
common to the actions previously transferred to the District of Delaware and assigned to Judge
Farnan.
_ Pursuant to Rule 7.4 ofthe Kglgs of E;_q_ogdure of the Judicial Panel on Multiclistrict Litigation, 199
F.R.D. 425, 43 5-36 (2001), these actions are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the District of
Delaware for the reasons stated in the order of November 8, 2005, and, with the consent of that
court, assigned to the Honorable Joseph J. Faman, Jr.
" Thisuorder does nofbeco`m'e'"E£H°ective until it is filed in thefjffice of the Ciéiiltnovf tl1 § *~""*"°'
District Court for the District of Delaware. The transrnittal of this order to said Clerk shall be
stayed 15 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the
Panel within this 15-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.
FOR THE PANEL:
Inasmuch as no objection Is •
pendin at th` Ii th -.
stay l8 Elted. IS ms, as _
. Q gr = N. Luau
its it ss ’ strictest
CI.EHK'S OFFICE
JUDICIAL PANEL ON
hAgLf;IQ_j_$]_'_@3T LITIGATION

Case 1:08-cv-OOO10—JJF Document 8 Filed O1/14/2008 Page 2 of 2
IN RE: INTEL CORP. MICROPROCESSOR ANTITRUST
LITIGATION MDL No. 1717
` INVOLVED COUNSEL LIST (CTO-2)
Eric H. Andersen
PRICKETT JONES & ELLIOTT PA _
13l0King Street ‘ .
Box 1328 ‘- · ‘ . ‘‘`’
- ..... .,. ....-».m..;-~-- ., ..,. . . M- . .... ... .. . . M,. ..,,.. A- ..
‘ Brent W. Landau
COHEN MILSTEIN HAUSFELD & TOLL PLLC
One South Broad Street
Suite 1850
Philadelphia, PA 19107
Brandt Powers Milstein ‘
YOUTZ & VALDEZ PC
900 Gold Avenue, SW ·
Albuquerque, NM 87102
Daniel A. Smell
COHEN MILSTEIN HAUSFELD & TOLL PLLC
l 100 New York Avenue, N.W.
West Tower, Suite 500
Washington, DC 20005
Robert J. Stolt
- _ LIPMAN KATZ & MCKEE
P.O. Box 1051 __ __,____ _ _
1 ¤~.m·rs·rr;¤§??"te,{.*z{ 02
ASQA 'IflwE"¤012Y=_ -._
l V ` Ki tg Q
PETE8 LQALLEO.
. BY E ` ‘G- O4-¤~+~
?;·<— Q. . lqfy cfik
J T' l

Case 1:08-cv-00010-JJF

Document 8

Filed 01/14/2008

Page 1 of 2

Case 1:08-cv-00010-JJF

Document 8

Filed 01/14/2008

Page 2 of 2