Free Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 71.5 kB
Pages: 3
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 436 Words, 2,765 Characters
Page Size: 613 x 789 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/9353/125.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut ( 71.5 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply to Motion - District Court of Connecticut
Case 3:00-cv-00706-SRU Document 125 Filed O9/20/2004 Page 1 of 3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OP CONNECTICUT
BROADWAY THEATRE CORP, )
I
I
I
V. ) CIVIL ACTION NO: 3:00——CV-00706 (SRU)
)
I
I
BUENA VISTA PICTURES )
DISTRIBUTION, COLUMBIA )
PICTURES INDUSTRIES, INC., )
DREAMWORKS DISTRIBUTION L.L.C., )
LIONS GATE FILMS INC., )
I\¤IETRO—OOI.D‘»VYN—It/IAYER )
DISTRIBUTION CO., MIRAMAX FILM )
CORP., NEW LINE CINEMA )
CORPORATION, PARAMOUNT )
PICTURES CORPORATION, SONY )
PICTURES RELEASING )
CORPORATION, UNIVERSAL FILM )
`EXCHANGES, INC., WARNER BROS. )
DISTRIBUTINO, AI\II) USA FILMS, LLC ) SEPTEMBER I7, 2004
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
The Defendants, pursuant to L.Civ.R. 7(b) 2, hereby move for an extension of time of an
edditionaI ten days, to and including October IS, 2004, to fiie a Response in Opposition to the
Piaintiffs Motion to Vacate dated August 12, 2004.
Good cause exists for the granting of this motion in that the time limitation in question
cannot reasonabIe be met despite the diligence of counsel and each defendant for the reasons
stated in the Defendants’ motion of August 13, 2004. Additionaiiy, the parties have agree. to
ORAL ARGUIVIENT NOT REQUESTED

Case 3:00-cv-00706-SRU Document 125 Filed O9/20/2004 Page 2 of 3
limited discovery on the matters raised in Plaintiff s Motion to Vacate. Due to scheduling
conflicts of counsel andthe Jewish holidays, Plaintiff s counsel has requested that the deposition
scheduled for September 29, 2904 he continued to September 27, 2994, and the defendants have
agreed to that re-scheduling. Accordingly, an additional ten days is necessary to complete the
discovery and for the defendants counsel to prepare an appropriate response to Plaintiff s Motion
to Vacate.
Plaintiffs counsel, Attorney Max Brunswick, does not obj ect to the granting of this
motion.
This is the third motion for extension of time tiled with respect to this limitation.
Respectfully Submitted,
THE DEFENDANTS,
i=ie‘ ..
Richard W. BOW€I1I13.H(Ci 9418},)
Elizabeth K. Andrews (ct2()986)
Tyler Cooper & Alcorn, LLP
295 Church Street
Post Office Box {SF36
New Haven, Connecticut 96509
(293) 784~8290
(293) 777~1 13E (fax)
e-mail: %>oateofeaet’i§€;t<;leteooeeeeorii
- Their Attorneys ~
-

Case 3:00-cv-00706-SRU Document 125 Filed O9/20/2004 Page 3 of 3
:_ CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Titis is to certify that 21 true and correct copy of the foregoing was seweci by Erst-class
mei} on Sepzemiaer 17, 2{H)4 to the foliowingz
Peter C. Spodick, Esquire
Y 8 Hazel Terrace
Woocibridge. Connecticut 06525
t Max F. Brunswick, Esquire
12 "frumsbuil Street
New Haven, Connecticut 065I E
Richard W. Bowermzm (ct 04181)