Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

I - —~
Case 3:00-cv-00328-AHN Document 71 Filed 10/28/2005 Page 1 of 3
I — ’ O O
i
I T ll,.
i ZUU5 OCT 28 ID l2= 22
I
W DISTRICT 000crI
I "*'T?T?ijiEFji’!'i?i2'lL l.Tt]i?¤Z}E
I UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
I DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
I At Bridgeport
I ________________________________________________ _ ____________ l
WINTPIROP HOUSE ASSOCIATION, INC-. ; I i
Plaintiff ; CIVIL ACTION N0. I
I ; 3-00-CV-328(AHN) I
I VS.
I EROOKSIDE ELM ASSOCIATES ; »
I LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, ET AL ; OCTOBER 26, 2005
i Defendants ;
I ··········—·------··-----·----·--····-------—--···~—---------
I STIPULATED RULE 6(bm) MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT OF TIME
I In accordance with Rule 6(b)(l) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 9,
i Preiss Breismeister, P.C. and Frederick A. Preiss, defendants in the above-referenced action,

respectfully move for an enlargement of time until forty tive (45) days from the date of this motion to
December 12, 2005. This enlargement of time is requested in order to permit the appearing defendants
sufficient time to prepare a responsive pleading. The present matter has been stayed (since
approximately 2001) to a date thirty (30) days past the completion of mediation proceedings. The
parties participated in several mediation Sessions, as well as extensive briefing and oral argument in
connection with certain advisory opinions sought. The final mediation session concluded on
September 26, 2005.
l
413925 j
i.

I
l
i Case 3:00-cv-OO32@HN Document 71 Filed 10/%8Z§OO5 Page 2 of 3 `
i " lu \, __,__
l .
I As a result of this stay, and the span of 4 years between mediation sessions, no scheduling
order has been finalized in this case. A status conference is scheduled for November 2, 2005, at which
{ time deadlines for pleading, discovery and other issues contemplated under Rule 26(f) may be
p determined.
In addition, theccunsel for plain-tiff, Philip H. Bartels, and counsel for Brooksnidefflm )
i n Associates Limited Partnership, Coll_ins Properties, LLC, Collins Enterprises, LLC, and Arthur Collins
ll, Jane I. Milas have no objection to this Motion. `
Based on the foregoing, defendants Preiss Breismeister, P.C. and Frederick A. Preiss,
respectfully submit that good cause exists for this Court to grant their Motion for Enlargement of
Time.
Respectfully submitted,
DEFENDANTS,
PREISS BREISMEISTER, P.C.
and FREDERIC · . ‘ ’ S
W
B -é..._;
· Cl-I E ·· . DIGHELLO, JR., ESQ.
Feder ar Number ct17521
Updike, Kelly & Spellacy, P.C.
One State Street .
Hartford, CT 06123-1277
Tel. (860) 548-2600
4l3925 2 I
. _ _l
ll l

1 Case 3jOO-CV-0032wHN Document 71 Filed 10/28/2005 Page 3 of 3 [
1 - » · O 1
CERTIFICATION OF SERVICE
A copy of the foregoing has been mailed by iirst class mail, postage prepaid, this 26th day of
October, 2005 to: 1
Philip H. Bartels, Esq. 1
1 Shipman & Goodman, LLP
1 289 Greenw-ich·Avenu‘e
Greenwich, CT 06830
. Jane I. Milas, Esq.
‘ Garcia & Milas
44 Trumbull Street
New Haven, CT 06510-1001
By: [ q
RI ‘ A I.`1· l · - o,JR., ESQ.
Updi e, r ly & Spellacy, P.C.
l
I
i
413925 3