Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 57.9 kB
Pages: 2
Date: October 23, 2003
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 389 Words, 2,485 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/23001/41.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut ( 57.9 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut
I CCCC I%M;___w“__—T__m““_tTFm“—__—*'_-_w_;”'-—“—_—_"“*`——l
Case 3:03-cv—OO63gDJS Document 41 Filed 10/21gOS Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT H l P “E._ U
_ DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT l
MARIO RICHARDS, ; U U an A · I I
on behalf of himself and : CIVIL ACTION NO. . __ , __ a
all others similarly situated : 3:03 CV00630 (DJS) ( . A ` [lm
PLAINTIFFS, : E " " ‘ · ‘ ~~—»l l
° 2
v. : I
COMPUTER SCIENCES l
CORPORATION : October 20, 2003
DEFENDAN T.
PLAINIQFS MOTIQN FOR ENLARGEMENT OF
NUNQ PRQ TUNQ RE: MOTION TO CQMPEL \
Plaintiff, Mario Richards, requests pursuant to Local Rule 7 (b) that the coun
grant an enlargement of time to October 21, 2003 to tile a reply to defendantfs motion to E
l
compel discovery in connection with det`endant’s discovery requests dated May 9,
2003. This is the iirst request for enlargement of time in this matter.
l
Procedural Background
The plaintiff Mario Richards, commenced this action on April 7, 2003 pursuant l
to the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. 201 et seq. (FLSA), claiming wages for _
overtime hours worked in excess of forty hours per week. The parties tiled a Rule 26 (t) .
report and a scheduling order was entered by the court (Squatrito, J,). The defendant, g
served interrogatories and requests for production on the plaintitf on May l0, 2003. l
Reason for lguest
Counsel for the plaintiilj Michael J. Melly, spent substantial time during the week
l
of September 29, 2003 in deposition in this matter. Counsel has also recently been
l
i


1 I I Case 3:03-cv—0O63€=|§J-S Document 41 Filed 10/2162003 Page 2 of 2 `
1 1
1 representing other clients in matters requiring substantial time and attention. Plaintit? s 1
1 response was due on October 16, 2003. Counsel inadvertently neglected to Hle for an
I
extension as he thought he had already done so.
1 Opposing Counsel
Opposing counsel consents to this request.
Plaintiff}
Mario Richards 1
I . w
Mic ael . <' lly ,1 1
Fed. Bar N . et17 41
143 Oneco Aven Suite 4
New London, CT 06320 i
. (860) 447—l99O
(S60) 989-9613
1
cngrmggrrog
I hereby certify that a copy ofthe foregoing was mailed on /9i/A ?'g) 1
To: -
Tasos C. Paindiris, Esq.
William Anthony, Esq.
Jackson Lewis
55 Farmington Avenue
Suite 1200 `
Hanford, Ct 06105 I
Mich e .
1