Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

- °`¥ Case 3:03-cv—OO9€§WIG Document 65 Filed O3/@04 Page 1 of 4
llailti li ‘ if Jl? I " lt-? Im}
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT I V · I
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT I · r I
THOMAS MATYASOVSZKY, on behalf of : I
himself and all other persons similarly situated, : CIVIL ACTION NO.
Plaintiffs, 2 ·
: 3:03-CV-968 (WIG)
V. :
HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF
BRIDGEPORT, ET AL, : MARCH 25, 2004
Defendants. : l
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO MODIFY SCHEDULING ORDER DEADLINES R
l
Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 26 and D. Conn. Loc. R. Civ. P. Rule 7, plaintiff
l
respectfully moves the Court for an order modifying the Scheduling Order. Counsel for l
l l
the defendants have consented to the proposed modification. By this motion, the Q
plaintiffs seek to extend the time for disclosure of plaintiff s expert by thirty days, with a
corresponding modification of the remainder of the Scheduling Order.
Counsel for the plaintiff have been engaged in reviewing approximately 700
tenant applications during the last tive weeks. This process has occupied both of the `
plaintiffs’ attorneys for two to four days a week and should be completed by on or about _
April 2, 2004. The discovery process has simultaneously been constrained by the

availability of the Bridgeport Housing Authority staff and opposing counsel. It has {
l
l


I
` “ Case 3:03-cv—0O9€8)W|G Document 65 Filed 03/@004 Page 2 of 4
I
therefore become necessary to seek the instant extension. I
The proposed extensions, if granted, would modify the following dates in the I
Scheduling Order:
Plaintiff’ s expert disclosure: April 22, 2004
Damages analysis May 8, 2004
Defendants’ expert disclosure: June 1, 2004
Defendants’ deadline to depose plaintiffs expert: June 13, 2004
Plaintiffs deadline to depose defendants’ expert July 13, 2004
I
Discovery completed July 13, 2004
Dispositive motions August 16, 2004
Joint Trial Memorandum November 13, 2004
Trial Ready December 13, 2004
Plaintiff has moved this Court to modify the Scheduling Order on two prior
occasions.
I
I
I
I
I
‘—“;_r;—""""""“""‘T”'""__;““““““_ ‘—V _"‘“""””"“m““““‘”""——

` In Case 3:03-cv—OO968)WIG Document 65 Filed O3/@004 Page 3 of 4 I
V I
I
I
Respectfully submitted, I
PLAINTIFF THOMAS MATYASOVSZKY 2
I
By I
Jen ifer ick sq.
(ct 24089)
1115 Main Street, Suite 415 I
Bridgeport, CT 06604 I
Tel.(203) 384-1245, Fax. (203) 384-1246
Email: [email protected]
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
' '

I
I I
In Case 3:03-cv—OO9(68jWIG Document 65 Filed O3/€%OO4 Page 4 of 4 |
CERTIFICATION I
This is to certify that a copy of the foregoing has been delivered by facsimile I
transmission on this day, March 25, 2004 to:
Michael Ryan and James Mahar I
Ryan, Ryan, Johnson & Deluca, LLP I
80 Fourth Street, P.O. Box 3057 I
Stamford, CT 06905-3057
Fax (203) 357-7915
I. ~ I
I
I
Com issioner o uperior Court

I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
,_,,_mi,a,,m“__,_._,_,_I
crr·*rWM"“**I“*‘·‘“"·““—""‘