Free Motion for Summary Judgment - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 128.5 kB
Pages: 4
Date: January 7, 2005
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 939 Words, 5,868 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/22874/47.pdf

Download Motion for Summary Judgment - District Court of Connecticut ( 128.5 kB)


Preview Motion for Summary Judgment - District Court of Connecticut
l I M Case 3:03-cv—OO944—RNC Document 47 Filed O1/06/2005 Page10f4 f
U Nlecl Slqles Dle`lri COUFT Faeee
Dl'$Tr`lcT el? C0mneJl`<,¤T
2m15JAN-b P ¤= 0%
Je mes ww l<¤'r>r¤<>¤ E ’e’§§·ll?é%l‘B‘€{$$*éllT
\/S. 5 QM L vw 3205C.v CHM
1 l · me DPM l
Yvonne Celelleloillilllg LQ M ) g
·’
December 29,100% Q
Delienelcmla Ineliwlduel C<;lpc.¤c,`lT»3)
Qlcgllvvwulfpp lYl0`l:»l`0Yl IS uncle? Qele SHO}, HSS0 le
Su pl eoevl Oéfjeved clcfleel Qegembew gu.-
ggpgwl ¢§?>r~ plc¤¤¤T¤ T0 $eryel eevll Plgde Ol? Sew
mee alTTclc,hecl To pleclclmg. E
I- jcmmes YYl cu- Qepg Tc; We cfl Tormewj 0 l? cle l?enclcmT’s_c¤l?'l`ec0»*@|Tl¤¤s
.2Jbq mj el? December wow by mellreg VY TG We
ClTTOr*vxe~j lmxncllfmcj CC>Wl§>|O**l`¤T·
Q. mmlfgm P0? pcll“`li'0ll. Summary ;lu©l<5—men`T l l
pwgwem TO vgle Sm, l?@d,l2.<;iV.,Q The (`C’C15cOv}§
Dnellrli liovpefc Sel FO MM mllxe l?>l0»¤'viT£’l?`P3 9 lslilclevll H
cm wwe 1nSU »· "— __
QQOPTOP Ylne melwm P`mm\.pC
B*~3>¤)&»-»<¤ 1Lu“5Y\¢lc\.Ve l l
`3`clmeg L < Y\’l€Kw‘~n0v1 pm-ge l
CCJU"'(`i Qfl EMAJSK; l
(Lwwreiltonrxyl (§*;»nT¢-;·p
C(E<”6( llevwleln New London
Uvwccl$~1°1llq; Cc·vm¤ZY1E;eT g
l ’ elle‘‘`‘e
______ - - 7 7 -m-7 WV- --7 rr- --7 -7 ;- V-A" ui ng --55 Lag

~ I
I \
. _' I
I . ‘ Case 3:03-cv—OO944—RNC Document 47 Filed O1/06/2005 Page 2 of 4 I
I UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT I
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT F ! L g ® I
—~———————————-— ~ -——--———----~———--——————————---——-———— x I I
r ZEIBII DEC 22 P 3:50 . I
JAMES MCKINNON : I
1 PRISONER {IIS. DISTRICT COURT
. . .r‘ I ~~ .»· ,(.‘ii ‘
vs. ;cm1 NO. s;0sev944(RNc) (D1¤MII YVONNE COLETTE, et al : I
---.-.... ..... ... .....- ..0.. ...... - ..... .....-... ........... ,.,..- ..... X
_ I
ORDER RETQRNING SUBMISSION _ _ I I
I I
The Clerk has received your MOTION FOR PARTIALLSUMMARY JUDGMENT; however, it is deficient in the area(s) I
checked below: I I
(NOTE: L.R. refers to the Local Rules, District of Connecticut)
1. L/_ L.R.5(b) __•(__ N0@ertificat§or“ service attached to pleading
__ Certificate of service fails to list names and addresses of all parties served I
_ Certificate of service is not signed
2. _ L.R.5(d) Failure to submit document under seal
3. __ L.R. lf) _ Failure to sign pleading (original signature) `
_ Failure to double space I
_ Margin is not free of printed matter I
_ Left hand margin is not one inch
_ Judge's initials do HOI appear after the case number I
_ Docket number is missing I I
_ Failure to supply federal bar number I
__ Holes not punched in document
4. _ L.R.68 Failure to file offer of judgment in a sealed envelope I
5. _ L.R.83. l(d) Motion to admit pro hac vice must be made by local counsel or member of the bar of this Court
6. _ other ___M_
The Clerk is hereby Ordered to return the above pleading and to notify counsel of such action. I
Date: gl; 'fo j ` I
W ited tes agistrate Judge
C C
s

A ..-. »— Case 3:0\s-lx[®Ebs;E@l*€t¥C D<§;uT[?@p`[`&7g Fi@ §g0F{2QU@_TP3Q63¤f4 ll D
\ u . l R i
J DEC 1-.7 ' Q COUPT __
DI$TY—`\CT D OF C.O¤Y1€<;\\`(.uT D
JOMGS |'TW€KxYSnc>m CK/YL no ?>?LO$CV CWM
V=» (REQ (DPW}
D Y C. I TT -E.
@CY$Z`°S$ SESQ. _°* TRL E
Cenjl 5<;|¤wm\< December 7l ,,2OOq
HGDHQM ‘
D {Dew lfncz H usbond [
»n°•Tc¤ Dormclvcm
Jlovvq Tclejlcw
DE p€Y] CIQOTIS I nd {KI C.C\QCQ`(;§w—k?p
. . . D _ h
p‘C4\YH-{pp m<>W0n POV QQPTIQL SUMMQPY `
jbdcj mcrwT
w*$ucmT Tc>_ Pda SQ>c$,Ped -Y?.C.i\1.p. @|¤inVY—`P wosg I
0miS YY)€KH'\V1OV\ PQCPUCSTK WIS C0uf"Y To Pan? ]m`m R
Umqnqgpg __\Ud%YV‘€nT QSTO We l!·Q‘C)f(l’T §6DC1€.P€_r;q[._
D carffs VV nna c>|eTT¤;)(@0mc lc:. Shec{)(j(Ccr~¤j} gCh_
[/J·`nH (\_IC`r“/xcllfl) Kpckulme HU$b‘—`*”€()(¤'¤Tc{ DOHQUG
1Q)'L¤nn]TF O P Wwe; gluewgiirucess c> V Low Th reqg, *
_ Cm W gm _S€w cw M me e>¤¤:wn·1>P’$ cfm °"’$
1T Cmd bpm F lm SUQFDOWT OpD'|€ VYIG-Tlbr; CND
Pm.- mv I
‘éCJQv‘i£iiEt;";;*<’ W
g;Grr’?;)$GT`;\E>n¤€ `(`2Ze.n`lE=·rf ?
°M€~$~¥m’%’€»YE€i¤€Z¥T'b" I

_ ' , Case 3:03-cv—OO944—RNC Document 47 Filed O1/06/2005 Page40f4
g Ce¥`T{ F`(ggQ`\;;;y;
I hevebkj Cc=i<*T1@j Ww©\T Q Qopaj ©FThc2. ]
Pe w`e%<>`mcj wei mlhifed `Ib We dc¥`<:.m<;£-0mTg
clTT0Pw€~6L- Gp Ficerd WMS QQ [kn QQ? OQ
D€C€m.((>—ey~{ QQQ q L
,.. , .,

Worm T e j
(16**3* $ F) _
€_+Q\lmz H uebcmd
ITNYQ Donovan

l %\. Ke¤T?m?/
}C}%$€ST UO, $\n€r*m.0m ST‘,\€€"( p}Q(mmp
)~(cmTDOr~c{ QT Igwqéb/W5.
;SO\VY\C$ {.66 YY/L;(6e’?¤·;1OVl
C<>r~r~¢`jw»_ @20 cp/j¤<><»~»S/rf
Cc>r*r‘c*`T(0r>q,{ CQDQP
OZXQ, Y7<>f`<»wEh Hcwawggw,
L2Y1 cc, 33,2
x