Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

""_“'““'““““"““’““""“”“‘”"‘"·"·~····—··—·——— ............... .
J _ Case 3:03-cv—OO612-RNC Document 17 Filed O3/10/2004 Padefi ldféilrl
[ O <;>
J Fll,.l:E@
I Ztlllll MAR -3 to 2, 35
l it $*2 ow ·- .; . .
t UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ° S {til
{ DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT ( ' "J " ·’*’ L i~
ROBERT R. CARLSON, : CIVIL ACTION NO-f§_:03CV0612 (RNC)
l Plaintiff, : .
VS. Z
I HARTFORD FINANCIAL SERVICES :
I GROUP, INC. :
l Defendant. : March 5, 2004
I pp AGREED-UPON MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
'•—j ‘ Pursuant to Local Rule 9(b), plaintiff Robert Carlson hereby moves for a two—week
l Q
l E ` extension of time within which to complete discovery in the above—captioned case. Discovery is
t D
Si currently scheduled to be completed by March 15, 2004. There has been no previous requrest for
· ct
E ` .9. an extension of this deadline.
, JJ
E i E5: ln support of this Motion, the plaintiff respectfully represents as follows.
rg L Z A. Plaintiff had subpoenaed a third party witness, his former supervisor who is no longer
.:.1
· $—l
qi B employed by the defendant, for a deposition to be held on Monday, March 8. 2004.
(U
JJ D5
g B. Defense counsel has informed the undersigned that the witness is leaving for Colorado
l—l
(D
and expects to be away and unavailable next week.
·<|•
3 C. Defense counsel has also informed the undersigned that this witness works out of state
-
cf ?_ several days a week.
§ E @ Cb
ll " W. 2
‘°"" ec · ..... --
··"“““ -.;£_ lm gi`, · I .
go V5,.
eq-°¤ :*5
~ ii_—_—_—_—i i?%_-gm? 7 - M U W I _ N Wulf I I _-JI`:" ‘ ‘ * ·· ——·= —.—--.~ .- __ A
-_%_%—%—%—_¥ _T__gp:p3M· l p H p V --`M_'P I `_"`i" ` ‘ " rk- I-= —ee- - I L
V 7 I-- ir T-LL?-:77; _- V - _ - -7 71717 7: - 17 -L` r___r' ; _;·“;rlh .`