Free USCA Mandate - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

q - __ Case 3:03-cv-00583-JCH Document 93 Filed O9/21/2005 Page 1 of1 l
Els'. JE] --"`”.....l ' ‘ E
A ll. DA FEI
D. Conn.
03-cv—583
Hall,]. l
l i
United States Court of Appeals
Fonnaa
SECOND CIRCUIT
At a stated Term of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second
Circuit, held at the Thurgood Marshall United States Courthouse at Foley Square, ’
inthe City of New York, on the 28th day of July, two thousand and__f§e, 5 p
Present: l Q _ (TI
Hon. Rosemary S. Pooler, r 5 p l
‘ Hon. Robert D. Sack, was cuvstnpép ““ umn ’
Hon. Soma Sotomayor, ,;s°° \°`*LEP$, I ’° ». l
Circuit Jud es = "L J5 F QD J
g ` , ’ JUL 2 B - Q
, 4· _ °~ '
"`\@” 8. M¤`tY·¤l¤l‘*‘;”':{\K;‘\
Luis Fernandez, •$`EcgND·(;\?·G
Plaintiff—Appellant, ' · l
V. e 05-1163-pr
John J. Armstrong, etal., K
_ Defendants-Appellees. {
Appellant, pro se, moves for assignment of counsel and in forma pauperis status. Upon due
consideration, it is ORDERED that the motions are DENIED and the appeal is DISMISSED
because it lacks an arguable basis in law or fact. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i); Neitzke v,
Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 327 (1989).
- I FOR THE COURT:
A Roseann cKechnie, Clerk A
er .
M,. ,... »‘f\'§lE’EUW\ J
msrmsM•¤uEcHws¤§
1


as
_g’_.¤· » _ - ‘
A mlssued as Mandate; spp 1 3 Q[][]5i 5_

__,_
’·* N —»-r»=r- #»~s>%..£s1,;4£zg.g£., M, uT;,.;,.;,;%·t i= 2: EJ ;: x ; E E Q.:

To To .... -. t