Free Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 75.5 kB
Pages: 4
Date: December 31, 1969
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 507 Words, 3,212 Characters
Page Size: Letter (8 1/2" x 11")
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/22561/61.pdf

Download Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut ( 75.5 kB)


Preview Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut
Case 3:03-cv-00444-AWT Document 61 Filed O4/05/2004 Page 1 of 4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
ROSEMOUNT AEROSPACE INC., :
Plaintiff, : Civil Action No. 303CV0444
vs. :
WEED INSTRUMENT COMPANY, INC., :
and HARCO LABORATORIES, INC., :
Defendants. : APRIL 2, 2004
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
Defendants Harco Laboratories, Inc. ("Harco") and Brad Powell ("Powell"), pursuant to
Local Rule 7(b), move for an extension of time for serving responses to the discovery requests of
Plaintiff Rosemount Aerospace, Inc., with respect to the Plaintiff’ s Third Request for Documents
served on Harco and the First Request for Documents served on Powell (collectively, "the
Rosemount Requests”).
Responses to the Rosemotmt Requests are due to be served on April 6, 2004. Harco and
Powell respectfully request that the time be extended for 30 days, until May 6, 2004. This is the
first request for an extension of time concerning these particular discovery requests by
Rosemount.
ST:2832lvl

Case 3:03-cv-00444-AWT Document 61 Filed O4/05/2004 Page 2 of 4
It will not be possible to complete the discovery responses as of the date presently
scheduled, and the present time limitations cannot reasonably be met, despite the diligence of
Harco and Powell.
The undersigned spoke with Rosemount’s counsel, Daniel W. McDonald, Esq.
conceming the adjournment. Rosemount’s counsel conditioned consent to the extension of time
based on production of certain documents on or before April 16, 2004, however, the specific
documents subject to that deadline were not identified as of the time that this motion was served.
Harco and Powell cannot predict at this date that they can comply with the April 16, 2004
j deadline. Accordingly, Harco respectfully requests that its Motion for an extension of time be
granted.
EPSTEIN BECKER & GREEN, P.C.
By DMz5;%.,-.4
David S. Poppick, Esq. 3202)
Attorneys for Defendant
HARCO LABORATORIES, INC. and
BRAD POWELL
One Landmark Square, 18th Floor
Stamford, CT 06901
(203) 348-3737
and
Robert B. Wise, Esq.
WISE & WISE
Attorneys for Defendant
HARCO LABORATORIES, INC.
1100 Summer Street
Stamford, CT 06905
(203) 359-8877
ST:2832lvl 2

Case 3:03-cv-00444-AWT Document 61 Filed O4/05/2004 Page 3 of 4
TO: Daniel W. McDonald, Esq.
William Schultz, Esq.
Joel E. Bergstrom, Esq.
MERCHANT & GOULD P.C.
3200 IDS Center
80 South Eighth Street
Minneapolis, Mirmesota 55402-2215
(612) 332-5300
James Mahanna, Esq.
DAY, BERRY & HOWARD LLP
CityPlace 1
Hartford, CT 06103-3499
(860) 275-0100
ST:2832lvl 3

Case 3:03-cv-OO444—AWT Document 61 Filed O4/05/2004 Page 4 of 4
CERTIFICATION
The undersigned hereby certifies that a copy of the foregoing was sent, via regular mail,
this 2“d day of April 2004, to:
Daniel W. McDonald, Esq. (ct23281)
William D. Schultz, Esq.(ct25198)
Joel E. Bergstrom, Esq.
Merchant & Gould PC
3200 IDS Center
80 South Eighth Street
Minneapolis, MN 55402-2215
Telephone: (612) 332-5300
Facsimile: (612) 332-9081
James Mahanna, Esq. (ct24681)
Day, Berry & Howard LLP
CityPlace 1
Hartford, CT 06103-3499
Telephone: (860) 275-0100
Facsimile: (860) 275-0343
¤§/{ 2 Q?
David S. Poppick
ST:2832lvl 4