Free Order on Motion to Continue - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut

_ — ase 3:03-cr-OO19E3e§lNC Document 825 Filed O1/EOSZOO5 Paget of1
l LM >—· ¤¤ KX
· O _ ¤—1
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
M at · ron THE
I 4% 5, g 5 DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT p
sa ‘ E
l M E EL '°
gi ·$ e 9;
5 g ox ··········“*··*·*·············“·*·· *· ············ ·······X
iii T3 ,5 4.· _:,,: .
l -5 “’ § ‘“ uwrso STATES or AMERICA é? /
l M E cu Q ’ _%§lL`,` n... , ‘~‘*
p u D eu g Llljl ;_?;_QLY L- I `-
§gj_ rams ,g, § as
<» M g e cmM1N€l§;t;;g\4AIa"ERf”“
gg .3 "‘ "E VS. NO. 3:03@R¢l9 C§}°”"§’“}}
`4 •—< — $4 —~
F Ll m cu FJ Q-’ ____ é===¤·
' U 0
§ aj ’é;; ; ANTONIO MARRERO, 5 January 1r;-ance".-5°
tl B E D f d t I
H T, e en an
s§§% ·······~············~······················· · ·~····· X
4* l
>· rz cd
list
(Q $ § jg MOTION T0 CONTINUE JURY SELECTION
Q M pg
FU J} G5
sdf?
-·-I E Ll-A
E: El E g Defendant Antonio Marrero, in the above captioned criminal matter, through counsel, .
*1* ow
E E ig Ei respectfully moves the Court hereby to continue the date for jury selection in this case from i
:1 ·-1
g* 0 at E
e “’ ¤· E the currently assigned date of February 8, 2005, untill April 12, 2005, or the Court’s next jury
U
§ ¤ ·v B
r¤ . . . . . .
gt Q 5 at Selection date thereafter. In support of this mot1on, the defendant provides as follows:
_ ·¤-l JJ {U
Q ug 4% E 1. On November 17, 2004, defendant appeared before the Court, United States
g 0 l
€ E E `§\ Magistrate Judge Derma Martinez, to change his plea in this case and enter a plea of guilty. l
E 3 E *5 Ve close to the conclusion of the plea proceeding, during that portion of the plea where
33 S2 O ¤> ly
rl . L.-;
g E EN 3 gdlefendant allocates as to those facts or events that make him guilty ofthe crime to which he
'U Cl} l~l >* _ ld.-:
ig 5 E g i (EE pleiiidirfg, defendant responded in a way that made it apparent that he could not continue his
qs mlm , I
$5 E Q . a (plea atrfrlat time. l
, E "' Q 1 N : ·-·· {tit l
Q g gg Z __ 1;;, Ef?2n;<; Despite efforts by counsel for the defendant and the government on the day of I
»—l CD ' {_1\·~.‘E_
V -1 · "“; ` \
3 if E Q plea, it became obvious we would be unable to resurrect the plea at that hearing. Q
e§§§. 5
H cu o M rd
',>‘ U2 mj tm 2 t
H mu cu
qg 0 · · ·U
$’ D TJ Li B '
E Ul ·r—l U] `
ra -5 E :3 8 p
-·‘_
2 7, H e-e-, »
-?? ii 3; ii so ·· so ·· i‘i‘c
as cc as I ee·ee