Free Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut - Connecticut


File Size: 55.8 kB
Pages: 1
Date: February 6, 2004
File Format: PDF
State: Connecticut
Category: District Court of Connecticut
Author: unknown
Word Count: 397 Words, 2,418 Characters
Page Size: 612.72 x 1008 pts
URL

https://www.findforms.com/pdf_files/ctd/20583/26.pdf

Download Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut ( 55.8 kB)


Preview Order on Motion for Extension of Time - District Court of Connecticut
jg A! Case 3:02-cv-O21€i—€tWT Document 26 Filed O2/(@0Oé Q\C'P`j1g£\t%>o,j\lmEA\_\ {WE,
i K U.} P · .
a I
I E UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT é?,,'j,” § I i -_,
, I DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT Q
,5; AND _ mm! JAN 28 p I2_ _
M LMAN : CIVIL ACTION NO. ‘ 0 '[
(U Plqintmfs : Docket Noiltif)2 · T DPM
t _ t ttdittiwiitt ’
3 v. ; Q,ar’ · C TT
= l
.2 JAMES CASSIDY, PH.D., JD., AND : _.
Et GARRELL MULLANEY, C.E.O. : I
_ Ddendants : JANUARY 27, 2004 |
si . u
8 DEFENDANTS’ SECOND MOTION FOR ENLARGEMENT
_ OF TIME TO FILE THEIR MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT I
O S
LI Pursuant to Local Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 7(b), the defendants, James Cassidy, I
I
E
G, Ph.D., J .D., and Garrell Mullaney, C.E.O., move for an enlargement of time to tile their motion
st
0
E 3 for summary judgment. The defendants’ motion for summary judgment is currently due on
cn
0 February 9, 2004. j
sz: 3 I .
; III To date the defendants have not received the plaintiffs responses to their discovery
0 Q
E request, Defendants ’ First Set Of Interrogatories And Request For Production Of Documents T 0
B Ig; Plointgjfs which was mailed to them on August 13, 2003. In accordance with Local Rule of
H I
,.4 *+-4
Q E Civil Procedure Rule 37, counsel for the defendants had attempted to resolve this issue without l
in
m
é judicial intervention. The defendants were not able to resolve the issue of the outstanding
F6 é
lg discovery without judicial intervention and, therefore, were forced to filed a Motion for Order
éi asking the court to either compel the plaintiffs to respond to Defendants ’ First Set Of
QI 3 Intjerrogqtogges And Request For Production Of Documents To Plaintwfs or to dismiss the
E @2 ‘·‘‘ ··*’ ,,3 l
_ {Q g li plaintiff§.*I_Iaiii;ended complaint.
--1 gr;
E §§ ;;I:» Counsel for the defendants has been diligently working on the motion for summary
0 tn t “ T '"ITC
Q-4 . Q4 J ~ ...» F It
Q 3 E: judgment. tljlowever, without the plaintiffs’ responses to the defendants’ discovery requests, the
A 1 si ‘ I
ta
sa cz
Z -r+
§ EZ I
L9 si:
I ._-Q .;1;.-,2 -- L-- L--€`L=r£;;é:-;r ;—; ar. ITLNM-- ( ) V I V -;i; I
I .~.;.i A .... ._._, · » - .- ,,_, . _ I